IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: 2nd Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-httpbis-rand-access-live-03

Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au> Sun, 08 April 2018 00:18 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AED6126C83 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 7 Apr 2018 17:18:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.661
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.661 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id izNyNaNlXxWK for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 7 Apr 2018 17:18:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0EB6124D68 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Sat, 7 Apr 2018 17:18:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1f4xtt-0004c6-3P for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Sun, 08 Apr 2018 00:09:41 +0000
Resent-Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2018 00:09:41 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1f4xtt-0004c6-3P@frink.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([128.30.52.79]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <phluid61@gmail.com>) id 1f4xtj-0004bF-PH for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Sun, 08 Apr 2018 00:09:31 +0000
Received: from mail-it0-f53.google.com ([209.85.214.53]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <phluid61@gmail.com>) id 1f4xtg-0001jk-JF for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Sun, 08 Apr 2018 00:09:31 +0000
Received: by mail-it0-f53.google.com with SMTP id 19-v6so6027817itw.3 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Sat, 07 Apr 2018 17:09:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=Rp7CKkX31sMnJqztYLPbndKD5Mmk5jRsS8rtPm39UPQ=; b=DHx+FZUXT3WOSlM0+rMscrTE861SZRh8PhTXi2l9I0ypECd9l9fNL2bGc3w9Fsv+kq SgVVy17qYPbl6+fFVu95WLzsfGQ7KjnCPmnGkCEhhjQYwE62Ig176iL/TEiMOmjYqp4m MVHWYIVyTLr8lRBab6PHe+6XuA9iP5V1QPa8zrGAbxAPerBhJDUCrhvb5LBMkbr3sBFD gnZnBvYXNsvn6ZRjUkdIlOfweyPOc9+nv0rpInGozh1u1zAIV0LDerskVSNqQaFjoIRx zEh7Quj/PcP8kCH+RaS1mEOLISS/+nm3S6u4nYVB3s0Zc2ocrI/eZRxUxrNfErEdcImG BEww==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Rp7CKkX31sMnJqztYLPbndKD5Mmk5jRsS8rtPm39UPQ=; b=I1PrVmBdCa3NZj7E4QEbigr1X1CSOOlLPyrAzrt2XW8kNNV63zhAhU/ODdS2mQpNnm uXqEe9d/Jsvu6GtRcfBHAZNg5drv5HQTjISsfzVOIXroNDrCT5i42bfGy3nY7SZcDvqk 09L4I+lUwfeaN/IWafGidRP2hbmjuMjCYp780opz95RWHqj1Xhb4zonU1lvMPdP/QtbX M5VtPvd4Ip6HFOj5BIUrxise8HlSHs/7KDc43BPtuRP8JeidNAr1NLMTAzO3UPpAKo5B J58tGuZk717DVdIqJYLcJIwvnnIWr3oYYYcnrRExsydChHKing38dxuXRle891onNl5l AKGA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tBlHnXhwHlJshEqMHHnoV50JZ+FSOVVSdqf3SW8OYQQuVYCyFL9 xkPfy4xjRUFAvfF2pVLSVHCl2nB3J6FIutNGoho=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4+6z7a3uNYkmtNBiAB2JUmxKqMIoj6ESZArEqehOYEbiG8gWsGcVuT4qnn2U3GeIKjsyiWcEmcIat+XowjYN/k=
X-Received: by 2002:a24:698a:: with SMTP id e132-v6mr23566245itc.71.1523146146043; Sat, 07 Apr 2018 17:09:06 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: phluid61@gmail.com
Received: by 10.107.200.130 with HTTP; Sat, 7 Apr 2018 17:09:05 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <24601140-678F-497B-9309-6967D6A15A4B@mnot.net>
References: <24601140-678F-497B-9309-6967D6A15A4B@mnot.net>
From: Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au>
Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2018 10:09:05 +1000
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 8oEAkX5_ck_1WGHilUCbVNPk90A
Message-ID: <CACweHNASV3pgKsC3jhuoUDXD2xfwCGsO0b2TCj46MywvDodWrg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.8
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-0.923, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1f4xtg-0001jk-JF 57bf76792ca89fb2c0eff6627710a38b
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: 2nd Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-httpbis-rand-access-live-03
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/CACweHNASV3pgKsC3jhuoUDXD2xfwCGsO0b2TCj46MywvDodWrg@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/35252
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 5 April 2018 at 11:10, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> Everyone,
>
> We've been through an extended WGLC for this document. The editors have incorporated feedback and published a new version:
>   https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-rand-access-live-03
>
> Changes from the last WGLC:
>   https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-httpbis-rand-access-live-03.txt
>
> Because the diff is not trivial (see 3.2. Shift Buffer Representations), we're having a second WGLC, ending on 19-04-2018.
>
> Please send feedback, statements of support or otherwise to the mailing list, or open new issues. If you spoke up during the 1st WGLC to support this, we'd appreciate hearing from you again.
>
> Regards,
>

The new chunk of text in 3.2 seems to address the big concern I had,
about shift buffer representations.  The earlier references (including
ABNF) are also appreciated.

I assume the RFC editor will deal with the capitalisation of "Very
Large Value" vs "very large value". I'm still not sure about the
double-caret exponentiation syntax, though: I've never seen it written
like "2^^63" or "2^^53".  Is this a thing?

Cheers
-- 
  Matthew Kerwin
  https://matthew.kerwin.net.au/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email