IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Prioritizing HTTP DATAGRAMs

Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com> Sun, 18 July 2021 20:14 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CC343A0867 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Jul 2021 13:14:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.996
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.996 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vWyoQbrlMq9j for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Jul 2021 13:14:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lyra.w3.org (lyra.w3.org [128.30.52.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E8143A0864 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Jul 2021 13:14:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by lyra.w3.org with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1m5D9G-0000Tu-FK for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Sun, 18 Jul 2021 20:12:26 +0000
Resent-Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2021 20:12:26 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1m5D9G-0000Tu-FK@lyra.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([128.30.52.76]) by lyra.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>) id 1m5D9E-0000T6-NX for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Sun, 18 Jul 2021 20:12:24 +0000
Received: from mail-ed1-f52.google.com ([209.85.208.52]) by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>) id 1m5D9C-0001jv-Uu for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Sun, 18 Jul 2021 20:12:24 +0000
Received: by mail-ed1-f52.google.com with SMTP id v1so20733655edt.6 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Sun, 18 Jul 2021 13:12:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=rzRcpjjKkpITHcUfiK911APOdQkF4FJJeYG+mQDujr0=; b=gBMzr2O8Jlj8y7cCxKEA4m4DQdSTFq5TrAefnP3SIofP9XqH3xkgHZKTQSIwjEiX94 I7+U6txMAZxnLO9zpS0q+v3ZZVDIV+o9qJ161hq2Qm7VJKflPeKQKSSq2a+bxT8KDcvL 6n6x1Hrt18lXQWm7uppenc+OcRLKl6YgJoOkjXH3oVDG0k3AfU4EZaEwnoTsgrM3GCH8 eP4LIbaf3ijs3qcgV2zvYJ0lKVDH+v0wgvn1w8FtAUA18m1ZBgiKrB/2kKFIPtlbcny+ 4IPqlNqDkLQTew9A3I3MBjN0wpR83LIaD8YuBJcnvnAAyejT5tqrZxJUj8c6ZCy0wzOc /Egw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=rzRcpjjKkpITHcUfiK911APOdQkF4FJJeYG+mQDujr0=; b=ehebEjmWaiTzQmXHjfeF7VIgQ+wkHwfvNrT1rh/+8tYKSdgZEDKR+ol1rp16VvHmlj QCTDSrW/sxGOZd4bxmV2Gnrq8P8OQH/NDgRhbZRpjUEpKqw9BvtxO+/C9QayJ/NE8vQY tQ58FLTJHIhQt2KjTPiM/8AzGgR3gKBbGZdzVqxD1GuJRsJpxscPzBchI9oLQE+Zem9g zkCSedMc+swLk6bjCeI9wleXuUg7HdrOGD4L/Y8BSpL+0M5e3fdtZsYjdMoPuTqm0D+f 4pcrj7f38RCpX3imD+NG+vLmGccB9exouAWMmwmEqp8bh3jxM9hOEzBJPfYlDoNzHudY c26w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531UBvfQGZlTH2UQk9K1mX/V1TaLzqzbWEUGddlSiWXNjxnmub1K C3uB4tVJNhPBvCTaTgBwBDnKsjIFsrPLy9P4L+c=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw2UjIKCDK5mEsDBKacgYcoo0YCgQIX5AaIxMDRw06yMm0bQ67W5RV1NpkzESpQzh7o0Ydy9MtVR/xW0AaF1yU=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1118:: with SMTP id u24mr30379174edv.229.1626638799879; Sun, 18 Jul 2021 13:06:39 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CALGR9ob=3CywgYvLJpSba6xCGwDEBzdJbuco28BMk9ayMcFe6Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAPDSy+7FFqs3may+L8dm6r-qNiFd-8028+29E35hoa_FQ7-CSQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPDSy+7FFqs3may+L8dm6r-qNiFd-8028+29E35hoa_FQ7-CSQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2021 21:06:28 +0100
Message-ID: <CALGR9oZhJmUxi5a8UWXmtPm4OBuuWFV1VbTHmg6U1GYXdqwMmA@mail.gmail.com>
To: David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, MASQUE <masque@ietf.org>, Kazuho Oku <kazuhooku@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d83fcd05c76b5b54"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.208.52; envelope-from=lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com; helo=mail-ed1-f52.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-DKIM-Status: validation passed: (address=lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com domain=gmail.com), signature is good
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.8
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1m5D9C-0001jv-Uu 68338ebf22369e028f180ba0c47c7a7a
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Prioritizing HTTP DATAGRAMs
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/CALGR9oZhJmUxi5a8UWXmtPm4OBuuWFV1VbTHmg6U1GYXdqwMmA@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/39053
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Hello all,

Thanks for the responses.

Circling back to this, we've landed the changes in the priority draft in
order to defer on DATAGRAM prioritization.

I published draft-pardue-masque-dgram-priority-00 [1] just before the IETF
111 cutoff but it lacks some important details. The editors copy [2] is
where I'm continuing to fill out details, so I encourage people to take a
look at the repository [3]. The MASQUE chairs have kindly scheduled some
time to discuss the topic.

Cheers,
Lucas

[1] - https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-pardue-masque-dgram-priority-00.html
[2] -
https://lpardue.github.io/draft-pardue-masque-dgram-priority/draft-pardue-masque-dgram-priority.html
[3] - https://github.com/LPardue/draft-pardue-masque-dgram-priority

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email