RE: [Hubmib] Hubmib documents status
"Matt Squire" <MSquire@HatterasNetworks.com> Mon, 23 October 2006 00:27 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gbnex-000133-FE; Sun, 22 Oct 2006 20:27:19 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gbnew-00012y-2W for hubmib@ietf.org; Sun, 22 Oct 2006 20:27:18 -0400
Received: from mail.hatterasnetworks.com ([72.15.200.21]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gbneu-0007Gq-Ne for hubmib@ietf.org; Sun, 22 Oct 2006 20:27:18 -0400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [Hubmib] Hubmib documents status
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 20:27:03 -0400
Message-ID: <467C77F6373BDE4BB16A3E8A62C03955A56ADC@Exchserv.hatteras.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [Hubmib] Hubmib documents status
Thread-Index: Acbx/Qs+MMM/1DJ9T/GiRKvqbH15OAEPGSAw
From: Matt Squire <MSquire@HatterasNetworks.com>
To: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>, "Hubmib Mailing List (E-mail)" <hubmib@ietf.org>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 10ba05e7e8a9aa6adb025f426bef3a30
Cc:
X-BeenThere: hubmib@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ethernet Interfaces an Hub MIB WG <hubmib.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hubmib>, <mailto:hubmib-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:hubmib@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hubmib-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hubmib>, <mailto:hubmib-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: hubmib-bounces@ietf.org
Bert - The -05 version of draft-ietf-hubmib-efm-mib was submitted early today as an Internet draft, and should be showing up in the database early next week. The changes from the -04 version are: - Changed last paragraph of Section 5 as per D Perkins comment - Changed text around the initial OUI value from "zero" to "three octets of zero" per D Perkins comment - Changed PDU size information to (0|64..1518) rather than (0..1518) with text saying "1..63 are not allowed" - Changed the order of enable/disable in the OAM state variable, and changed the order of passive/active in the OAM mode variable to match the order of these values in Clause 30 of 802.3 based on suggestions from yourself and Dan - Changed headers/titles to reflect new version and date Everything else should be the same as in the -04 version. - Matt > -----Original Message----- > From: Wijnen, Bert (Bert) [mailto:bwijnen@lucent.com] > Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 11:00 AM > To: Hubmib Mailing List (E-mail) > Subject: [Hubmib] Hubmib documents status > > Dear HUBMIB WG members. > > Below is the status of the documents that we have on our plate. > This is the status that Dan reported to me, after which I did > a little bit of follow up. > > > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-hubmib-efm-mib-04.txt > waiting for revision after MIB Doctor review by David Perkins and > following discussion. I (Bert) have an outstanding ping to Matt > Squire, the editor of this document, for a response on this. > I really hope we can have an answer and a revised MIB document soon. > > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-hubmib-efm-epon-mib-05.tx t > revised after MIB Doctor review by Dave Perkins. No confirmation > from David if he is happy with this version. I (Bert) have pinged > David to see if we can get an answer soon. > > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-hubmib-rfc3636bis-05.txt > submitted to the AD for consideration as Proposed Standard. Mike Heard > assigned as MIB Doctor, has done review and reported so to our WG list > a few days ago. I (Bert) havce re-issued a request for Publication > (with a few changes to the proto-write-up) which I have copied > (earlier today) to the WG list. So for this document, we DID make the > milestones as listed in our current WG charter. > > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-hubmib-efm-cu-mib-06.txt > following WGLC of revision 5, a set of changes was required, including > moving the ifAvailableStackTable to a distinct MIB module (say > IF-AVAILABLE-STACK-MIB, seating directly under MIB-2) and adding an > inverse table ifInvAvailableStackTable, which would allow the ADSLMIB > WG to refer and re-use them. The new revison (6) was posted on > Oct 12th. I (Bert) am hereby asking the WG for review (I will issue a > WG LC in a separate message) to approve the changes. > > Pls note that these 3 documents > > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-hubmib-efm-cu-mib-06.txt > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-hubmib-efm-epon-mib- > 05.txt > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-hubmib-efm-mib-04.txt > > all 3 have a milestone in our current WG charter for submission to the > IESG in November 2006. So we have max 6 weeks to complete this work. > > Bert > > _______________________________________________ > Hubmib mailing list > Hubmib@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hubmib _______________________________________________ Hubmib mailing list Hubmib@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hubmib
- [Hubmib] Hubmib documents status Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
- RE: [Hubmib] Hubmib documents status Matt Squire