[Hubmib] FW: AUTH48 [AH]: RFC 5066 <draft-ietf-hubmib-efm-cu-mib-08.txt> NOW AVAILABLE
"Edward Beili" <EdwardB@actelis.com> Thu, 15 November 2007 10:13 UTC
Return-path: <hubmib-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Isbir-0005U0-D8; Thu, 15 Nov 2007 05:13:21 -0500
Received: from hubmib by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Isbiq-0005SN-Mw for hubmib-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 15 Nov 2007 05:13:20 -0500
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Isbiq-0005Nl-2M for hubmib@ietf.org; Thu, 15 Nov 2007 05:13:20 -0500
Received: from il-mail.actelis.net ([62.90.13.193]) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Isbip-0004Eo-DQ for hubmib@ietf.org; Thu, 15 Nov 2007 05:13:19 -0500
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6556.0
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1255"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 12:13:47 +0200
Message-ID: <9C1CAB2B65E62D49A10E49DFCD68EF3E0129D779@il-mail.actelis.net>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: AUTH48 [AH]: RFC 5066 <draft-ietf-hubmib-efm-cu-mib-08.txt> NOW AVAILABLE
Thread-index: AcgmT6x7ZMroDjCWR3OO2bKj0geYIwAmDiFQAAU0aYAABFzQcAAAvI9QABXDZPA=
From: Edward Beili <EdwardB@actelis.com>
To: hubmib@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: de4f315c9369b71d7dd5909b42224370
Cc: bwijnen@alcatel-lucent.com
Subject: [Hubmib] FW: AUTH48 [AH]: RFC 5066 <draft-ietf-hubmib-efm-cu-mib-08.txt> NOW AVAILABLE
X-BeenThere: hubmib@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ethernet Interfaces an Hub MIB WG <hubmib.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hubmib>, <mailto:hubmib-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:hubmib@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hubmib-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hubmib>, <mailto:hubmib-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: hubmib-bounces@ietf.org
Dear members of the HUBMIB WG, This is to inform you about a small editorial change made in the EFM-CU-MIB (RFC 5066 to be). I have replaced all occurrences of "64/65B" encapsulation with "64/65-octet" encapsulation which is the correct term used by IEEE in 802.3ah-2004 and 802.3-2005. Historically 64/65B was used during 802.3ah development, and was replaced with 64/65B-octet just before 802.3ah publication, to prevent possible confusion with 64B/66B encapsulation in which B stands for a 'bit'. Regards, -E. _______________________________________________ Hubmib mailing list Hubmib@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hubmib
- [Hubmib] FW: AUTH48 [AH]: RFC 5066 <draft-ietf-hu… Edward Beili