Re: [hybi] ws and bwtp thoughts

"Thomson, Martin" <Martin.Thomson@andrew.com> Wed, 21 October 2009 22:23 UTC

Return-Path: <Martin.Thomson@andrew.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D04033A6857 for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:23:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.534
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.534 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.065, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bYJ2SKQlagat for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:23:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from csmailgw2.commscope.com (csmailgw2.commscope.com [198.135.207.244]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA9483A6816 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:23:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.86.20.103] ([10.86.20.103]:62115 "EHLO ACDCE7HC2.commscope.com") by csmailgw2.commscope.com with ESMTP id S68342AbZJUWXt (ORCPT <rfc822; hybi@ietf.org>); Wed, 21 Oct 2009 17:23:49 -0500
Received: from SISPE7HC2.commscope.com (10.97.4.13) by ACDCE7HC2.commscope.com (10.86.20.103) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.393.1; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 17:23:49 -0500
Received: from SISPE7MB1.commscope.com ([fe80::9d82:a492:85e3:a293]) by SISPE7HC2.commscope.com ([fe80::58c3:2447:f977:57c3%10]) with mapi; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 06:23:45 +0800
From: "Thomson, Martin" <Martin.Thomson@andrew.com>
To: Greg Wilkins <gregw@webtide.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 06:24:09 +0800
Thread-Topic: [hybi] ws and bwtp thoughts
Thread-Index: AcpSF3YETLOotBnDRMGEK4WmOL9NQAAhKt9A
Message-ID: <8B0A9FCBB9832F43971E38010638454F0F1EA281@SISPE7MB1.commscope.com>
References: <8B0A9FCBB9832F43971E38010638454F0F1EA1D4@SISPE7MB1.commscope.com> <4ADEA997.10705@webtide.com>
In-Reply-To: <4ADEA997.10705@webtide.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BCN: Meridius 1000 Version 3.4 on csmailgw2.commscope.com
X-BCN-Sender: Martin.Thomson@andrew.com
Cc: "hybi@ietf.org" <hybi@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [hybi] ws and bwtp thoughts
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 22:23:41 -0000

Thanks Greg,

Just throwing out some other cat skinning tools... trying to be value-neutral in the process.

> I think websocket can be improved to have the capabilities
> I'm advocating and the other differences are not important.
> See my blog on this exact subject:
> 
>    http://blogs.webtide.com/gregw/entry/how_to_improve_websocket

This post was the impetus for my email.  You make some good points there, but then use that as a vehicle for expressing your opinion.  That's a valuable contribution to the debate, but I wanted to approach this a little more objectively; approach from a different angle.

> If you are concerned about reducing data usage,

That's another variable in the mix.  I personally tend to value aspects like maintainability more highly.

Sure, metadata overheads are high, relative to our expected payload, but given the nature of the problem space, I believe that there are better ways to spend our specification/implementation complexity budget than on such optimizations.

--Martin