Re: [hybi] HyBi WG update

[Alexey Melnikov <[e-mail]>]

Hi Ian,

Ian Hickson wrote:

>On Mon, 21 Jun 2010, Salvatore Loreto wrote:  
>
>>The 00 version Ian Hickson has update contains in the Abstract section, 
>>the following note:
>>
>>     NOTE!  THIS COPY OF THIS DOCUMENT IS OBSOLETE.
>>
>>       For an up-to-date copy of this specification, please see:
>>
>>       http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-socket-protocol/
>>      
>>this note is against the IETF common practice, so we invite Ian to remove it.
>>    
>>
>The note is there because Joe requested that I not update the IETF copy as 
>often as the WHATWG copy. I need implementors looking at the latest 
>version of the draft. I don't really mind if they look at the HTML copy on 
>the WHATWG site (part of the Web Apps 1.0 draft), the text copy on the 
>WHATWG site, or the text copy on the IETF site, so long as what they look 
>at is up to date. Should I resume sending updates to the IETF draft as I 
>make them?
>  
>
No. You should post a new version not frequently than once a week, 
unless you have some massive changes, or urgent fixes.

And I would like to remind you that all non-editorial changes (and if in 
doubt about whether a particular change is editorial or not, please 
treat it as non-editorial) should be tracked using the issue tracker as 
described earlier by the HyBi WG chairs. At minimum, I would expect that 
you post summary of any non-editorial change to the mailing list, before 
you publish a new version of the draft that incorporates such change.

Best Regards,
Alexey

-- 
IETF Application Area Director, <http://www.ietf.org/iesg/members.html>
Internet Messaging Team Lead, <http://www.isode.com>
JID: same as my email address