IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [hybi] voting on frame length ideas

"Shelby Moore" <shelby@coolpage.com> Mon, 23 August 2010 15:02 UTC

Return-Path: <shelby@coolpage.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAA853A6894 for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 08:02:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.258
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.258 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.341, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Wn-xmxtd+WuY for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 08:02:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from www5.webmail.pair.com (www5.webmail.pair.com [66.39.3.83]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id A9E523A6817 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 08:02:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 64339 invoked by uid 65534); 23 Aug 2010 15:03:19 -0000
Received: from 121.97.54.174 ([121.97.54.174]) (SquirrelMail authenticated user shelby@coolpage.com) by sm.webmail.pair.com with HTTP; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 11:03:19 -0400
Message-ID: <b1e503db0cc9151427ed396d54a876e2.squirrel@sm.webmail.pair.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikMe=0gDs_z8gEkSceYNnYoL4qVaWhjUCHWf49F@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTinh5ON_L9yc29Y2CMrEeJHV=nvRhQauMSFi3ib1@mail.gmail.com> <4C7222EC.2000804@gmx.de> <AANLkTikVJ5dyK3LFWWhH2ZD6KgHdoSREo1N2UjyKN0O+@mail.gmail.com> <fd3c294d6196ffb6f0c1de931f533c40.squirrel@sm.webmail.pair.com> <AANLkTikMe=0gDs_z8gEkSceYNnYoL4qVaWhjUCHWf49F@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 11:03:19 -0400
From: Shelby Moore <shelby@coolpage.com>
To: John Tamplin <jat@google.com>
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.20
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Importance: Normal
Cc: Hybi <hybi@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [hybi] voting on frame length ideas
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: shelby@coolpage.com
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 15:02:46 -0000

> On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 10:52 AM, Shelby Moore <shelby@coolpage.com>
> wrote:
>
>> John, I appreciated the your effort on the informal poll, because it
>> enabled me to see that we were far from concensus, and that more
>> explanation/discussion was needed.  Also the format you used enabled me
>> to
>> change my vote as I gained more understanding.
>>
>
> Participation has been limited so far, but I think it does mean we can
> discard the v76-style length and {7,8}/63-bit schemes from further
> consideration, as they have a sole proponent and multiple negative votes
> against them.

+1

I meant to suggest that.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email