[hybi] short term requirements

Salvatore Loreto <salvatore.loreto@ericsson.com> Fri, 16 October 2009 16:15 UTC

Return-Path: <salvatore.loreto@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24EA628C22B for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 09:15:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.669
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.669 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.340, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, SARE_LWSHORTT=1.24]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7aaxRqA8YfSy for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 09:15:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw5.ericsson.se (mailgw5.ericsson.se [193.180.251.36]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C60E028C132 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 09:15:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb24-b7bd7ae000002270-97-4ad89c084fa5
Received: from esealmw126.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by mailgw5.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 50.D5.08816.80C98DA4; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 18:15:04 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from esealmw126.eemea.ericsson.se ([153.88.254.174]) by esealmw126.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 16 Oct 2009 18:15:04 +0200
Received: from mail.lmf.ericsson.se ([131.160.11.50]) by esealmw126.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 16 Oct 2009 18:15:04 +0200
Received: from nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se [131.160.33.3]) by mail.lmf.ericsson.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63C872946 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 19:15:04 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EA9521A22 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 19:15:04 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD51521A21 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 19:15:03 +0300 (EEST)
Message-ID: <4AD89C07.8060500@ericsson.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 19:15:03 +0300
From: Salvatore Loreto <salvatore.loreto@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090825)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "hybi@ietf.org" <hybi@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Oct 2009 16:15:04.0477 (UTC) FILETIME=[D201FCD0:01CA4E7B]
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Subject: [hybi] short term requirements
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 16:15:03 -0000

Hi there,

as you may have read on the Agenda draft,
during the BoF meeting we will discuss, among other stuff, requirements 
for Short Term solution.

This is a call to collect requirements that you think a Short Term 
solution should meet.

Draft-loreto-http-bidirectional 
(http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-loreto-http-bidirectional-00.txt)
is a tentative to describe best practices for bidirectional HTTP in the 
context of HTTP as it exists today.
In order to design additions (section 6 of the draft to see some 
example) that could enable improved mechanisms
for bidirectional HTTP  (short term solution) we have to identify the 
requirements that those additions have to meet
in order to improve interoperability and such to provide an improved 
experience.

Here a first rough list of requirements collected from the bar BoF in 
Stockholm and from the HyBi mail discussion.
It is just a list to start the discussion

Req.   possibility for the intermediaries to access and modify it
Req.   it must be usable from multiple (existing) browser
Req.   it must be easily to use and accessible from different protocols 
(e.g. Bayeux, Bosh etc)
Req.   it must be easy to deploy in the existing infrastructure
Req.   it has really improve the bi-directional communication (not just 
push from a server to a client)
Req.   it has not introduce any security hole


please provide comments, opinions, suggestion.

best regards
Salvatore Loreto