Re: [hybi] [tsv-area] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-hixie-thewebsocketprotocol-35.txt
Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org> Sat, 05 September 2009 14:24 UTC
Return-Path: <jamie@shareable.org>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD3113A67C1 for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 5 Sep 2009 07:24:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.963
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.963 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.364, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fVyT3iADM-fC for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 5 Sep 2009 07:24:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail2.shareable.org (mail2.shareable.org [80.68.89.115]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 025973A67D8 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Sat, 5 Sep 2009 07:24:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jamie by mail2.shareable.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <jamie@shareable.org>) id 1MjvMK-0006CS-Lq; Sat, 05 Sep 2009 14:31:16 +0100
Date: Sat, 05 Sep 2009 14:31:16 +0100
From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
To: L.Wood@surrey.ac.uk
Message-ID: <20090905133116.GI24516@shareable.org>
References: <20090816093001.319053A692F@core3.amsl.com> <015CC5B3-A697-46D5-B76D-3BC609A4E13D@nokia.com> <4835AFD53A246A40A3B8DA85D658C4BE01368948@EVS-EC1-NODE4.surrey.ac.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4835AFD53A246A40A3B8DA85D658C4BE01368948@EVS-EC1-NODE4.surrey.ac.uk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
Cc: hybi@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [hybi] [tsv-area] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-hixie-thewebsocketprotocol-35.txt
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Sep 2009 14:24:35 -0000
L.Wood@surrey.ac.uk wrote: > > I don't see the reason for Connection: upgrade / Upgrade: WebSocket > as the handshake mechanism. > Surely a Content-* header (say: Content-Upgrade: WebSocket) is better, > as > it will be explicitly dropped and 501'd by proxies or by sources > not supporting web sockets? (per section 9.6 of RFC2616.) That > way, you know when the handshake has failed... What part of RFC2616 says Content-* headers must be dropped by proxies which don't support them? It certainly isn't section 9.6 ("PUT"), nor any other section I'm aware of. -- Jamie
- Re: [hybi] I-D Action:draft-hixie-thewebsocketpro… L.Wood
- Re: [hybi] I-D Action:draft-hixie-thewebsocketpro… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [hybi] [tsv-area] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-hixie… L.Wood
- Re: [hybi] [tsv-area] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-hixie… Ian Hickson
- Re: [hybi] [tsv-area] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-hixie… Jamie Lokier