IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [hybi] Questions and comments on draft-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-10

Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com> Fri, 22 July 2011 10:44 UTC

Return-Path: <henrikn@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C75C621F85F1 for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 03:44:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_43=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ow0PD3Z2I6cu for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 03:44:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.microsoft.com (mail2.microsoft.com [131.107.115.215]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38D3721F85CA for <hybi@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 03:44:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from TK5EX14MLTC101.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.79.178) by TK5-EXGWY-E802.partners.extranet.microsoft.com (10.251.56.168) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.176.0; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 03:44:07 -0700
Received: from TK5EX14MBXC218.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([169.254.8.174]) by TK5EX14MLTC101.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.79.178]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.002; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 03:44:07 -0700
From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
To: Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>, "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>
Thread-Topic: [hybi] Questions and comments on draft-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-10
Thread-Index: AcxIXEewN169NRPGSyqtNjVmjInTJg==
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 10:44:06 +0000
Message-ID: <F1D6C4CA564CA347B3B9EB54BEA5AD7C0CCF0161@TK5EX14MBXC218.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [157.54.51.34]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, "hybi@ietf.org HTTP" <hybi@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [hybi] Questions and comments on draft-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-10
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 10:44:08 -0000

Greg,

There was a related thread on http-wg mailing list(see [1]).  Please see in particular [2] and [3].

Hope this helps,

Henrik

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2011JulSep/thread.html#msg112
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2011JulSep/0158.html
[3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2011JulSep/0170.html

> Ok I think I'm getting you more now.   It is not that you want
> WebSockets to give an immediate semantic final response to the GET request,
> rather you don't want websocket to consider the 101 to be that final response
> because it is by definition a non final response.
> So you say that this could be resolved by the spec making it clear that the event
> stream accesses by the ws handshake is semantically the response to the
> handshake GET?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email