IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [hybi] Comments on draft-ietf-hybi-permessage-compression-05

SM <sm@resistor.net> Mon, 08 April 2013 21:21 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9393721F904B for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Apr 2013 14:21:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GX9TvcEAomo0 for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Apr 2013 14:21:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B5ED21F8FC7 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Apr 2013 14:21:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r38LLCeF029686; Mon, 8 Apr 2013 14:21:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1365456076; bh=9cDOt2ogu8lBMr+KLHuqNiDvQ/j1V0cz2MB7UxC2ZhU=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=Q3NJA0NiL1CbX+qrLkykVwu8ECfQg2pL+2PTjnTBUZarv6Dk4+S9fQdENg0e/zPx0 O97rkD1zpAhTei9allyTn0gX54hzpg4D8Y0rru0vkPA6Wem8KOt2pHIMNLC4ho/yzy w8T4iJdYisdFcUj3NKJ8Vt3oZw38/khneSuE44Zw=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1365456076; i=@resistor.net; bh=9cDOt2ogu8lBMr+KLHuqNiDvQ/j1V0cz2MB7UxC2ZhU=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=cN6EFQxPNkFNPhBClzUtljK/XCOZdjx5hEPE7UHCjLDO28P2xMdE9Hbr/3dPMisj2 ui+vYr4V+/1TAQTD06ZxPDul3Pe/GKRL8DoD4BSEEVQSADDpj/sxXhrQdakIVXSBsl nJ0Jukcr2UkeakQ7aC6Jt2/IQ5HaS8K+bioAzleo=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20130408140630.0b6b4868@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 14:11:44 -0700
To: Takeshi Yoshino <tyoshino@google.com>
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAH9hSJYEm84jp-YqP96dwSra0idO3TgeB0qXwjJ7O13TNkdN4Q@mail.g mail.com>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20130223175715.094d8508@elandnews.com> <CAH9hSJZT6-5szxCoHPROujqKZSXumLmi8TKqN11w6oEfcOOpXg@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20130322234602.0bf66450@resistor.net> <CAH9hSJYEm84jp-YqP96dwSra0idO3TgeB0qXwjJ7O13TNkdN4Q@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: hybi@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [hybi] Comments on draft-ietf-hybi-permessage-compression-05
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 21:21:24 -0000

Hi Takeshi,
At 06:11 01-04-2013, Takeshi Yoshino wrote:
>I think now the examples of permessage-deflate except the first one 
>are not getting into implementation details:
>- endpoint does X
>- the result will be frame Y, frame ...
>- Z in Y means blah blah, W in Y means blah blah

Ok.

>There are three RFC 2119 key words in the above, i.e. MAY, SHOULD, 
>MUST.  The client "SHOULD be able to accept" is an assumption.
>
>
>Hmm. I meant it's recommended to make clients be able to accept the 
>c2s_no_context_takeover.

In that case it could be made straight-forward by, for example, saying:

   Clients SHOULD accept the "c2s_no_context_takeover" parameter.

>I'll changed it to use RECOMMENDED and separated them from 
>requirement paragraph.

You could use that instead.

Regards,
-sm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email