IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [hybi] US-ASCII vs. ASCII in Web Socket Protocol

Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> Tue, 02 February 2010 00:55 UTC

Return-Path: <ian@hixie.ch>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7BF13A67F2 for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Feb 2010 16:55:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.386
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.386 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.213, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gBSEh9OV61hN for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Feb 2010 16:55:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from looneymail-a2.g.dreamhost.com (caibbdcaaaaf.dreamhost.com [208.113.200.5]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A8633A6782 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Feb 2010 16:55:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ps20323.dreamhostps.com (ps20323.dreamhost.com [69.163.222.251]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by looneymail-a2.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E1AD16D322; Mon, 1 Feb 2010 16:56:27 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 00:56:27 +0000
From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
To: SM <sm@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20100201163955.09373f40@resistor.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1002020055080.21600@ps20323.dreamhostps.com>
References: <9124e09b0911052218y5106a2d4qcda01ff67577679b@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0912032337580.15540@hixie.dreamhostps.com> <4B1905FC.1000205@verizon.net> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1001300901270.22027@ps20323.dreamhostps.com> <4B6466EB.2090909@gmx.de> <4B656465.1080005@airemix.jp> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1002020027000.3846@ps20323.dreamhostps.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20100201163955.09373f40@resistor.net>
Content-Language: en-GB-hixie
Content-Style-Type: text/css
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Cc: hybi@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [hybi] US-ASCII vs. ASCII in Web Socket Protocol
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 00:55:51 -0000

On Mon, 1 Feb 2010, SM wrote:
> At 16:30 01-02-10, Ian Hickson wrote:
> > I used "ANSI_X3.4-1968" because that's the canonical name for US-ASCII,
> > and I used RFC1345 because that's the canonical reference. If you disagree
> > with these choices, please update the IANA registry.
> 
> Julian Reschke is correct; RFC 1345 should not be used as a normative 
> reference.  Please use the reference that he suggested 
> ([ANSI.X3-4.1986]).

Again, I'm just using what the IANA uses. If the IANA's reference is out 
of date, then please update the IANA registry. I've no intention of 
playing reference hot potato, where every 3 months the "best reference" 
changes and I have to update all the references.

RFC1345 works fine as a reference for the purposes of the Web Socket 
spec, anyway.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

v2.28.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status