IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [hybi] CONNECT handshake text

Ian Fette (イアンフェッティ) <ifette@google.com> Thu, 09 December 2010 00:13 UTC

Return-Path: <ifette@google.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF8F83A68D4 for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 16:13:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -109.754
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-109.754 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.078, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tTdLo32Ozr3e for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 16:13:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp-out.google.com (smtp-out.google.com [74.125.121.35]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7E4D3A68CE for <hybi@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 16:13:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wpaz37.hot.corp.google.com (wpaz37.hot.corp.google.com [172.24.198.101]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id oB90Esc9007340 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 16:14:55 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=beta; t=1291853695; bh=8mDASC9L4bAopcpXdiz1AnLQEDU=; h=MIME-Version:Reply-To:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: Subject:From:To:Cc:Content-Type; b=q1fCdtAWS+E1AHMxjoGnhNvHS9IuQmEHVDCll9ki3j35QF/wuvNGWvDl3VRYysepV vfH4ngkbb7npnysh9kexA==
Received: from gxk27 (gxk27.prod.google.com [10.202.11.27]) by wpaz37.hot.corp.google.com with ESMTP id oB90EH1u010394 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 16:14:53 -0800
Received: by gxk27 with SMTP id 27so929739gxk.36 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 16:14:53 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:reply-to :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type; bh=1u9p7133k2U44EIKnu5gIfSpNGzYX/xIW3W1fqC4gv8=; b=e/B8lJzEbD8gzxRMqRzs8GvxVJjeQzzbQTtdo1FQjPwxbAKcWJ4WwvY3VoaiRTXLJV 0r0sVoGJFayTdUwqnr1A==
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=google.com; s=beta; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=T8ihQgrS2mVPdbbWfdUv/aD8tIZZfBO3tFJeBKOuPAsBg41Uruc4sDeTM61OMU2B8P MmNcGToO3tEf7pRp9j1g==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.42.172.67 with SMTP id m3mr446145icz.95.1291853693609; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 16:14:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.231.37.194 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 16:14:53 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4D001D32.60603@gmx.de>
References: <AANLkTinEXHBeaUPo4gK2CHbq7ZHYnY2PE3Vb+Oi+K1NM@mail.gmail.com> <op.vnd6ijrzidj3kv@dhcp-190.linkoping.osa> <AANLkTimWpLUFuNR62Titix5WyJumnJg7rKXty1yX7G6O@mail.gmail.com> <2AFC40EF-BC43-4709-8160-5476643CFC83@apple.com> <BB31C4AB95A70042A256109D4619912605839C55@XCH117CNC.rim.net> <1291841275.2315.2048.camel@ds9.ducksong.com> <F0DD8214-57E8-446E-807B-413CEB73F9BD@apple.com> <4D001D32.60603@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 16:14:53 -0800
Message-ID: <AANLkTikcWJhVEK7wZpb=NUwqy_bBRtVGjTDuoOsKdVGf@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Ian Fette (イアンフェッティ)" <ifette@google.com>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="90e6ba6e837082663f0496ef20c4"
X-System-Of-Record: true
Cc: "hybi@ietf.org" <hybi@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [hybi] CONNECT handshake text
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: ifette@google.com
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 00:13:28 -0000

Personally, I agree on not restricting. If a client or intermediary wants to
add extra headers (e.g. user-agent, accept-language etc etc etc) I don't see
why we would want to restrict it. Even in the old protocol header order
wasn't defined. All the browsers (and server libraries) already have code to
parse headers, to the extent we aren't inventing any new header formats I
don't see why it's problematic to say "Look for the following headers".

-Ian

On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>wrote:

> On 08.12.2010 23:41, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>
>> ...
>>
>> The section we were discussing is the description of what the client must
>> send. It doesn't talk at all about what the server should expect or how the
>> server should process what it receives.
>> ...
>>
>
> Not sure why we would *want* to restrict the client to a subset of the HTTP
> syntax when sending, if the recipient will need to grok all of HTTP syntax
> anyway...
>
> _______________________________________________
> hybi mailing list
> hybi@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email