IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [hybi] Fwd: Gen-ART last call review of draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-10

David Endicott <dendicott@gmail.com> Thu, 21 July 2011 03:48 UTC

Return-Path: <dendicott@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA41921F8552 for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 20:48:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I6gy8--bOlIx for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 20:48:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wy0-f172.google.com (mail-wy0-f172.google.com [74.125.82.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E553621F8553 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 20:48:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wyj26 with SMTP id 26so656930wyj.31 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 20:48:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=EtZ1kxp5I/qgJsrhctFfl84Rq2Dwu0uocql3aCe5iEs=; b=BB0yMSDNOPJQJiVuiHOg/dxEptbUeKbwRZDQ/71wlhJic9yG5ZWeSSW1dqALDl3071 TRSv03C8axJ91nYNakqtwgHOwyaKVfgsq2mH9tgRyvWzSqiOzZzQHvlfbZWHSLRTw+5+ vvlvke7hdpyEJm5qqyNjdOti7ZIoKvRo3ugd8=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.79.18 with SMTP id h18mr8995541wee.3.1311220107307; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 20:48:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.39.197 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 20:48:27 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABLsOLCUHbW2cfUZUdfugSrMPzRbUO9YK0r77Uq_UNFp0jcJEg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4E2792EB.2070408@stpeter.im> <CABLsOLCy3xAtXavSGc1mJA18Yhh7gZoaVX9Rg07Dyka1sNx0Tw@mail.gmail.com> <8B0A9FCBB9832F43971E38010638454F040D2C304E@SISPE7MB1.commscope.com> <CABLsOLCUHbW2cfUZUdfugSrMPzRbUO9YK0r77Uq_UNFp0jcJEg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 23:48:27 -0400
Message-ID: <CAP992=F9zipxN8hmh_9bjRDdyG0C0O-7UatNo5RFhSRq2kxdag@mail.gmail.com>
From: David Endicott <dendicott@gmail.com>
To: John Tamplin <jat@google.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000e0ce0b4f0b7eb8904a88c38bd"
Cc: "rbarnes@bbn.com" <rbarnes@bbn.com>, "hybi@ietf.org" <hybi@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [hybi] Fwd: Gen-ART last call review of draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-10
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 03:48:30 -0000

I hope you understand the anxiety around this issue.

>We're doing masking
Why?
> Because (somebody said they researched and besides we can imagine...)
Explain please.
> No.  If anyone else asks, somebody might blog some reasoning



On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 11:44 PM, John Tamplin <jat@google.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 11:37 PM, Thomson, Martin
> <Martin.Thomson@commscope.com> wrote:
> > To those providing responses to review comments like this, consider for a
> moment that perhaps the draft
> > does not - and should - provide the answer.
>
> There was discussion about that to, and the majority opinion (not
> mine) was that rationale did not belong in the spec.  If warranted, a
> separate rationale document could be written.
>
> --
> John A. Tamplin
> Software Engineer (GWT), Google
> _______________________________________________
> hybi mailing list
> hybi@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email