IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [hybi] Do we have a sense of when browsers will be supporting draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-03 ?

Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> Fri, 03 December 2010 08:17 UTC

Return-Path: <mjs@apple.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4BAF28C1B0 for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 00:17:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.344
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.344 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.345, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_37=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CtVrUEk6afJj for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 00:17:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-out4.apple.com (mail-out.apple.com [17.254.13.23]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 987C028C1AC for <hybi@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 00:17:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay16.apple.com (relay16.apple.com [17.128.113.55]) by mail-out4.apple.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8877C16C1FD for <hybi@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 00:18:57 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: 11807137-b7bf5ae000001937-40-4cf8a7f1cd3d
Received: from et.apple.com (et.apple.com [17.151.62.12]) by relay16.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id 20.E7.06455.1F7A8FC4; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 00:18:57 -0800 (PST)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Received: from [17.73.145.148] by et.apple.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-7.04 (built Sep 26 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0LCU00DS2F3G1N60@et.apple.com> for hybi@ietf.org; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 00:18:57 -0800 (PST)
From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
In-reply-to: <AANLkTikPn0qre=KGkY7wuVuENkau9Dizyd--NRXaY3tO@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 00:18:51 -0800
Message-id: <D8DA32CE-20C0-4DC1-9554-AC78D261FF32@apple.com>
References: <C91BE965.8745%mabutler@adobe.com> <AANLkTimP6KqAsSjWY9wipW=kxVGWEvBt0ANvOZh-QWyr@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTikpVoPfy+t7w5bjeNjhA+Go2Sf_s=LKQOsFJJA1@mail.gmail.com> <4CF7F045.9080000@caucho.com> <AANLkTinND6njAfUHY7c8UW=YK=-okmNErhZnW1TYhhsu@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTikPn0qre=KGkY7wuVuENkau9Dizyd--NRXaY3tO@mail.gmail.com>
To: Greg Wilkins <gregw@webtide.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Cc: "hybi@ietf.org" <hybi@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [hybi] Do we have a sense of when browsers will be supporting draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-03 ?
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 08:17:43 -0000

On Dec 2, 2010, at 11:07 PM, Greg Wilkins wrote:

> 
> The use of CONNECT instead of GET+Upgrade needs to be proposed as a
> change in it own right and not mixed up with several other issues.  If
> a CONNECT proposal can overcome the objections to it, then great!
> But it is not the only option we have.

You supported a CONNECT proposal yesterday:

http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi/current/msg04860.html
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi/current/msg04861.html

Do those messages reflect your current position?

Regards,
Maciej

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email