Re: [hybi] AD review of draft-ietf-hybi-permessage-compression-21

[Takeshi Yoshino <[e-mail]>]

Addressed in -23 (diff:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-hybi-permessage-compression-23).
If this looks rather bad, I'd revert it to the previous one.

Thanks

Takeshi

On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 7:30 PM, Barry Leiba <[e-mail]>
wrote:

> >> He-he.. I had thought to put the "Otherwise" parts into #2 items, and
> >> that's what I'd meant.  But I'm OK with it as you've done -- as you
> >> say, it reads better and more consistently that way.
> >
> > I was wondering if you meant so or not. I refrained from doing so as
> they're
> > not ordered steps but are cases of an if-branch.
> >
> > I agree that it would be better to make them formatted into a list. How
> > about non-number list like this? Numbered one would be better?
> >
> >    2.  Process the compressed data as follows:
> >
> >        *  If this PMCE is the last extension to process of outgoing
> >           messages, build frame(s) by using the compressed data instead
> >           of the original data for the message payload, and set the
> >           "Per-message Compressed" bit of the first frame, then send the
> >           frame(s) as described in Section 6.1 of RFC6455.
> >
> >        *  Otherwise, pass the transformed message payload and modified
> >           header values including the "Per-message Compressed" bit value
>
> That would work...
>
> Barry
>