IETF Logo Mail Archive

[hybi] Per-frame compression spec draft 06

Takeshi Yoshino <tyoshino@google.com> Sat, 10 March 2012 00:16 UTC

Return-Path: <tyoshino@google.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52C1621F8537 for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 16:16:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.956
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.956 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.020, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E9wHVQYfA87P for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 16:16:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-gy0-f172.google.com (mail-gy0-f172.google.com [209.85.160.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBEE821F84D3 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 16:16:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: by ghbg16 with SMTP id g16so1462813ghb.31 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Fri, 09 Mar 2012 16:16:17 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :x-system-of-record; bh=mjGkfC+ObjFphDpbYbcKhrAT/9V/MYwEG8t6zMY0eIU=; b=NGOPT/M5ownlXEbXhABXi4iE5/EYYJMnXz0C4GGlqKhtZ3Vu8kAk4kXsJ/qZI8Oo4w lOiidqgdPkilPYAKm+YsipqQGMJlN+8cRCzmFnke3kSA15K26EzfyIUIrBpANa/xCSdt MOvNhAzKSsEUoCq2tepOu5ygNDaHiza4Baz7rxGiv5oob++UJI04SofbXGgZ9rnOzSPY cgj1Jt54Y0yNNPe5LWsT3a0ftmSrhgSQjThVf4myuvYMKTA6Q0N+Hx/2Dx6Woci1DUFz h75TePhrLMVmvhASrv9xlVeHHJVsgDHZdZaL3E5d9CFjJ8A7GNr1sP9dmKSgTZJFk3rw qsWw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :x-system-of-record:x-gm-message-state; bh=mjGkfC+ObjFphDpbYbcKhrAT/9V/MYwEG8t6zMY0eIU=; b=UqSyHhlNE8ZZpmUsKBISV8zqo2D9O5H17hKTlYQc+w3ZOB9vU8WZZ942pWjH0ftT2G IDnQq4eBtjljVrAZDuv+73q2PXDTm4CgUDqIRjdPCxa73r3udNi5eN8L6XTn291uS2QL 4talOkvTOUqqqHot0kIS7491LTVx6PqES5dfZGkRX7S1c7NAYtU0KFxwCW5hqfX9re0O X0W0BZsW9PLQ0VXKzF1f5LrwyBJbM4+WQmHjDGbnuOdwHWRrmKqrYBGO2GWrkB99raq7 2iv/MwMlZb1KIOSk2SBFx0oJOEvldcS4ITP4fNI/JRtVUH9qieFI//CHwjpVy0iZQw9H M6oQ==
Received: by 10.236.195.38 with SMTP id o26mr4975537yhn.100.1331338577349; Fri, 09 Mar 2012 16:16:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.236.195.38 with SMTP id o26mr4975531yhn.100.1331338577270; Fri, 09 Mar 2012 16:16:17 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.101.155.5 with HTTP; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 16:15:57 -0800 (PST)
From: Takeshi Yoshino <tyoshino@google.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2012 16:15:57 -0800
Message-ID: <CAH9hSJY9d074n+jWZ7mK9O_jfw8rKecmqcKnzWG3KrWMP_UhRQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: hybi@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="20cf305e2763f958fd04bad86a12"
X-System-Of-Record: true
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmME1yn0oNXHlzdmQaNa7ewluPFF14DSVqvtO7E3G4QXG17WbfehBrKgqo7wCoOjBQ3FddIy9QoXLaltjVanZIvC0FVB6QU7B0dzPwbUeYFU3/RWr8tzCu5X6vVmZIzpaNxFsas
Subject: [hybi] Per-frame compression spec draft 06
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 00:16:18 -0000

Hi all,

Here's a revised version of the per-frame compression spec. I'm planning to
rename it to draft-ietf-hybi-websocket-perframe-compression-00 after the
meeting.
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-tyoshino-hybi-websocket-perframe-deflate-06

http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-tyoshino-hybi-websocket-perframe-deflate-06.txt
Based on the feedback comments for the CfC, I've done
- reordering of sections
- abstracting the framing method (COMP bit and how to build compressed
frames) as general per-frame compression scheme
- renaming COMP bit to "per-frame compressed" and giving more general
description for it in both the main texts and IANA consideration section

Thanks
Takeshi

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email