IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [hybi] minutes: HyBi meeting at IETF81

Gabriel Montenegro <Gabriel.Montenegro@microsoft.com> Tue, 02 August 2011 06:59 UTC

Return-Path: <Gabriel.Montenegro@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DF7611E80A6 for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 23:59:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uDUj7pXtVip7 for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 23:59:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.microsoft.com (mailb.microsoft.com [131.107.115.215]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC87D11E8094 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 23:59:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from TK5EX14MLTC104.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.79.159) by TK5-EXGWY-E802.partners.extranet.microsoft.com (10.251.56.168) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.176.0; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 23:59:31 -0700
Received: from TK5EX14MLTW652.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com (157.54.71.68) by TK5EX14MLTC104.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.79.159) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 23:59:31 -0700
Received: from TK5EX14MBXW604.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com ([169.254.4.51]) by TK5EX14MLTW652.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com ([157.54.71.68]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.002; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 23:59:30 -0700
From: Gabriel Montenegro <Gabriel.Montenegro@microsoft.com>
To: Salvatore Loreto <salvatore.loreto@ericsson.com>, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Thread-Topic: [hybi] minutes: HyBi meeting at IETF81
Thread-Index: AQHMUGz7G2+iBNbfbk+sz+emOCDJSJUIun2AgAAIQgCAACewgIAAN5Mg
Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2011 06:59:29 +0000
Message-ID: <CA566BAEAD6B3F4E8B5C5C4F61710C11403B9C70@TK5EX14MBXW604.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
References: <4E36DC50.6000005@ericsson.com> <4E36E68D.80400@stpeter.im> <20110801181626.GB25560@1wt.eu> <4E370EC5.7080501@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <4E370EC5.7080501@ericsson.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [157.54.51.42]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "hybi@ietf.org" <hybi@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [hybi] minutes: HyBi meeting at IETF81
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2011 06:59:29 -0000

I was taking hasty notes. I registered "agreed" whenever the room agreed with what we had on the slides. The slides read correctly that the call was to not include DNS SRV. The "use DNS SRV as part of the base spec" was just shorthand to refer to that subject, and was not meant to represent the actual phrase being agreed upon.

In general, the minutes register agreement or disagreement on the items as they are spelled out in the slides (not in the minutes themselves).

> -----Original Message-----
> From: hybi-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:hybi-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Salvatore Loreto
> Sent: Monday, August 01, 2011 13:38
> To: Willy Tarreau
> Cc: hybi@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [hybi] minutes: HyBi meeting at IETF81
> 
> On 8/1/11 9:16 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 11:46:53AM -0600, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> >> <hat type='individual'/>
> >>
> >> On 8/1/11 11:03 AM, Salvatore Loreto wrote:
> >>
> >>> - Use DNS SRV as part of the base spec            --Agreed
> >> Is that a typo? I thought there was consensus to *exclude* DNS SRV
> >> from the base spec.
> > That's what I heard too during the conf, but it is possible the notes
> > were taken based on the final agreement not to change the spec (from
> > what I recall hearing at the end of the discussion).
> 
> sorry it is a typo!
> it should be
> 
> > - Use DNS SRV as part of the base spec            --Rejected
> I will change it immediately.
> 
> 
> cheers
> /Sal
> 
> _______________________________________________
> hybi mailing list
> hybi@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email