Re: [hybi] WS URLs

Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> Mon, 24 October 2011 21:17 UTC

From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 23:17:22 +0200
Message-ID: <a6lba79ljh7vqdhgupaj8q6t8p6nd4obr5@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>
References: <AcyRAfMcynScsoopThG4iaBqB+cA5Q==> <634914A010D0B943A035D226786325D42D0B036D37@EXVMBX020-12.exch020.serverdata.net> <CADkeqZWDBH1KP2yLXSvNz+zyqGuWcwNBUzKgbupLCSZHsKXyTQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADkeqZWDBH1KP2yLXSvNz+zyqGuWcwNBUzKgbupLCSZHsKXyTQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: "hybi@ietf.org" <hybi@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [hybi] WS URLs
Precedence: list

* Alexey Melnikov wrote:
>On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Tobias Oberstein <
>tobias.oberstein@tavendo.de> wrote:

>> Which of the following URLs are valid WS URLs?
>>
>> 1. ws://example.com/something#somewhere
>> 2. ws://example.com/something#somewhere/
>> 3. ws://example.com/something#somewhere/foo
>> 4. ws://example.com/something?query=foo#bar
>
>I think all of these are invalid.

That is what the draft suggests. It seems incorrect to me for the draft
to prohibit using fragment identifiers. Fragment identifiers are not a
scheme-specific feature.
-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/

[hybi] WS URLs Tobias Oberstein
Re: [hybi] WS URLs Tobias Oberstein
Re: [hybi] WS URLs Alexey Melnikov
Re: [hybi] WS URLs Tobias Oberstein
Re: [hybi] WS URLs Julian Reschke
Re: [hybi] WS URLs Bjoern Hoehrmann