I-D Action: draft-hares-forces-vs-openflow-00.txt
internet-drafts@ietf.org Mon, 09 July 2012 00:56 UTC
Return-Path: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: i-d-announce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: i-d-announce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C87E721F87C5 for <i-d-announce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Jul 2012 17:56:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.579
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.579 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.020, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QtvfJImcoZAw for <i-d-announce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Jul 2012 17:56:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64C9F21F875D for <i-d-announce@ietf.org>; Sun, 8 Jul 2012 17:56:20 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
Subject: I-D Action: draft-hares-forces-vs-openflow-00.txt
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.30p2
Message-ID: <20120709005620.14492.46245.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2012 17:56:20 -0700
X-BeenThere: i-d-announce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: internet-drafts@ietf.org
List-Id: Internet Draft Announcements only <i-d-announce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/i-d-announce>, <mailto:i-d-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/i-d-announce>
List-Post: <mailto:i-d-announce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i-d-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce>, <mailto:i-d-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 00:56:20 -0000
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. Title : Analysis of Comparisons between OpenFlow and ForCES Author(s) : Susan Hares Filename : draft-hares-forces-vs-openflow-00.txt Pages : 46 Date : 2012-07-08 Abstract: While both ForCES and OpenFlow follow the basic idea of separations of forwarding plane and control plane in network elements, they are technically different. ForCES specification contains both a modeling language [RFC5812] which allows flexible definition of the Flow tables and flow logic. ForCES flow logic include Logical Functional Blocks (LFBs) connected in flow logic that is described in logic of direct graphs augmented by passage of Metadata and grouping concepts. OpenFlow's specifications contain a specific instantiation of Flow tables and flow logic which has emerged from the research community theories. OpenFlow's logic varies based on the revision of the specification (OpenFlow-Paper [McKeown2008], OpenFlow Switch Specification 1.0 [OpenFlow1-0], OpenFlow 1.1 [OpenFlow-1.1] Open Configuration 1.0 [OpenFlowConfig-1.0]). The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hares-forces-vs-openflow There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hares-forces-vs-openflow-00 Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
- I-D Action: draft-hares-forces-vs-openflow-00.txt internet-drafts