I-D Action: draft-rosenau-request-v6-option-00.txt

internet-drafts@ietf.org Sun, 11 February 2018 16:13 UTC

Return-Path: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
Delivered-To: i-d-announce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 039FF1201F2 for <i-d-announce@ietf.org>; Sun, 11 Feb 2018 08:13:14 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
Subject: I-D Action: draft-rosenau-request-v6-option-00.txt
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.72.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <151836559397.17194.13833222607223596965@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2018 08:13:14 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i-d-announce/JFRAL5F3NcIhFzEYIGQRGK5w1og>
X-BeenThere: i-d-announce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Internet Draft Announcements only <i-d-announce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/i-d-announce>, <mailto:i-d-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/i-d-announce/>
List-Post: <mailto:i-d-announce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i-d-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce>, <mailto:i-d-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2018 16:13:14 -0000

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.


        Title           : TCP option "request IPv6 connection"
        Author          : Martin D. J. Rosenau
	Filename        : draft-rosenau-request-v6-option-00.txt
	Pages           : 13
	Date            : 2018-02-11

Abstract:
   This document describes an idea for a header "option" for the
   Transmission Control Protocol (TCP).

   The extension is used by dual-stack nodes to force the use of the
   IPv6 protocol instead of the IPv4 protocol when exchanging data over
   TCP.

   Especially if one of the two nodes is a NAT64 or NAT46 router it
   makes sense not to use IPv4 but IPv6 if both nodes are dual-stack
   nodes.

   This document also suggests to declare the usage of such a method
   mandatory for all nodes that use IPv4 addresses that will be assigned
   by RIRs in the future.

   Doing so will make it impossible to (mis-) use IPv4 addresses
   assigned by RIRs to ISPs for IPv4-only nodes that do not support
   IPv6.


The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rosenau-request-v6-option/

There are also htmlized versions available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rosenau-request-v6-option-00
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-rosenau-request-v6-option-00


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/