I-D Action: draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2679-03.txt
internet-drafts@ietf.org Thu, 06 September 2012 13:38 UTC
Return-Path: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: i-d-announce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: i-d-announce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AB0921F8628; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 06:38:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.383
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.383 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.216, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Kya3aUAuYiag; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 06:38:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C315E21F8587; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 06:38:17 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
Subject: I-D Action: draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2679-03.txt
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.34
Message-ID: <20120906133817.18391.37025.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 06:38:17 -0700
Cc: ippm@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: i-d-announce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: internet-drafts@ietf.org
List-Id: Internet Draft Announcements only <i-d-announce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/i-d-announce>, <mailto:i-d-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/i-d-announce>
List-Post: <mailto:i-d-announce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i-d-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce>, <mailto:i-d-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 13:38:18 -0000
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the IP Performance Metrics Working Group of the IETF. Title : Test Plan and Results Supporting Advancement of RFC 2679 on the Standards Track Author(s) : Len Ciavattone Ruediger Geib Al Morton Matthias Wieser Filename : draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2679-03.txt Pages : 31 Date : 2012-09-06 Abstract: This memo provides the supporting test plan and results to advance RFC 2679 on One-way Delay Metrics along the standards track, following the process in RFC 6576. Observing that the metric definitions themselves should be the primary focus rather than the implementations of metrics, this memo describes the test procedures to evaluate specific metric requirement clauses to determine if the requirement has been interpreted and implemented as intended. Two completely independent implementations have been tested against the key specifications of RFC 2679. This memo also provides direct input for development of RFC 2679bis. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2679 There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2679-03 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2679-03 Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2679-03.t… internet-drafts