I-D Action: draft-sriram-replay-protection-design-discussion-02.txt

internet-drafts@ietf.org Mon, 23 September 2013 20:57 UTC

Return-Path: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: i-d-announce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: i-d-announce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D00121F8F24 for <i-d-announce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Sep 2013 13:57:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.498
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.498 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.102, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ceTsSPb+6BQX for <i-d-announce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Sep 2013 13:57:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C96C21F9E36 for <i-d-announce@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Sep 2013 13:57:11 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
Subject: I-D Action: draft-sriram-replay-protection-design-discussion-02.txt
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.72
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20130923205711.32168.52443.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 13:57:11 -0700
X-BeenThere: i-d-announce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Reply-To: internet-drafts@ietf.org
List-Id: Internet Draft Announcements only <i-d-announce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/i-d-announce>, <mailto:i-d-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/i-d-announce>
List-Post: <mailto:i-d-announce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i-d-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce>, <mailto:i-d-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 20:57:15 -0000

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.


	Title           : Design Discussion and Comparison of Replay-Attack Protection Mechanisms for BGPSEC
	Author(s)       : Kotikalapudi Sriram
                          Doug Montgomery
	Filename        : draft-sriram-replay-protection-design-discussion-02.txt
	Pages           : 16
	Date            : 2013-09-23

Abstract:
   The BGPSEC protocol requires a method for protection from replay
   attacks, at least to control the window of exposure.  In the context
   of BGPSEC, a replay attack occurs when an adversary suppresses a
   prefix withdrawal (implicit or explicit) or replays a previously
   received BGPSEC announcement for a prefix that has since been
   withdrawn.  This informational document provides design discussion
   and comparison of multiple alternative replay-attack protection
   mechanisms weighing their pros and cons.  It is meant to be a
   companion document to the standards track I-D.-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-
   rollover that will specify a method to be used with BGPSEC for
   replay-attack protection.


The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sriram-replay-protection-design-discussion

There's also a htmlized version available at:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sriram-replay-protection-design-discussion-02

A diff from the previous version is available at:
http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-sriram-replay-protection-design-discussion-02


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/