I-D Action: draft-iab-identifier-comparison-09.txt
internet-drafts@ietf.org Mon, 11 March 2013 04:01 UTC
Return-Path: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: i-d-announce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: i-d-announce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AB2721F84C6; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 21:01:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.527
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.527 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.073, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7bzXrYUcZwvC; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 21:01:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25EF521F87D9; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 21:01:08 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
Subject: I-D Action: draft-iab-identifier-comparison-09.txt
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.42
Message-ID: <20130311040108.18661.55310.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 21:01:08 -0700
Cc: iab@iab.org
X-BeenThere: i-d-announce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: internet-drafts@ietf.org
List-Id: Internet Draft Announcements only <i-d-announce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/i-d-announce>, <mailto:i-d-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/i-d-announce>
List-Post: <mailto:i-d-announce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i-d-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce>, <mailto:i-d-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 04:01:09 -0000
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Internet Architecture Board Working Group of the IETF. Title : Issues in Identifier Comparison for Security Purposes Author(s) : Dave Thaler Filename : draft-iab-identifier-comparison-09.txt Pages : 26 Date : 2013-03-10 Abstract: Identifiers such as hostnames, URIs, IP addresses, and email addresses are often used in security contexts to identify security principals and resources. In such contexts, an identifier presented via some protocol is often compared using some policy to make security decisions such as whether the security principal may access the resource, what level of authentication or encryption is required, etc. If the parties involved in a security decision use different algorithms to compare identifiers, then failure scenarios ranging from denial of service to elevation of privilege can result. This document provides a discussion of these issues that designers should consider when defining identifiers and protocols, and when constructing architectures that use multiple protocols. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-iab-identifier-comparison There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-iab-identifier-comparison-09 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-iab-identifier-comparison-09 Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
- I-D Action: draft-iab-identifier-comparison-09.txt internet-drafts