I-D Action: draft-gomez-tcpm-delack-suppr-reqs-01.txt
internet-drafts@ietf.org Thu, 26 March 2020 13:31 UTC
Return-Path: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
Delivered-To: i-d-announce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D44233A08E3 for <i-d-announce@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 06:31:59 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
Subject: I-D Action: draft-gomez-tcpm-delack-suppr-reqs-01.txt
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.123.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <158522951977.4232.17361965065938730145@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2020 06:31:59 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i-d-announce/TBG49_abmYO_mv9qk3T8BYYaLk4>
X-BeenThere: i-d-announce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Internet Draft Announcements only <i-d-announce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/i-d-announce>, <mailto:i-d-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/i-d-announce/>
List-Post: <mailto:i-d-announce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i-d-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce>, <mailto:i-d-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2020 13:32:00 -0000
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. Title : Sender Control of Delayed Acknowledgments in TCP: Problem Statement, Requirements and Analysis of Potential Solutions Authors : Carles Gomez Jon Crowcroft Filename : draft-gomez-tcpm-delack-suppr-reqs-01.txt Pages : 13 Date : 2020-03-26 Abstract: TCP Delayed Acknowledgments (ACKs) allow reducing protocol overhead in many scenarios. However, in some cases, Delayed ACKs may significantly degrade network and device performance in terms of link utilization, latency, memory usage and/or energy consumption. This document presents the problem statement regarding sender control of Delayed ACKs in TCP. The document discusses the scenarios and use cases in which sender control of Delayed ACKs offers advantages. Then, requirements for a potential solution are derived. Finally, a number of potential solutions are discussed, based on the requirements, and also considering pros and cons in each case. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gomez-tcpm-delack-suppr-reqs/ There are also htmlized versions available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gomez-tcpm-delack-suppr-reqs-01 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-gomez-tcpm-delack-suppr-reqs-01 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-gomez-tcpm-delack-suppr-reqs-01 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
- I-D Action: draft-gomez-tcpm-delack-suppr-reqs-01… internet-drafts