Re: [I2nsf] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-15: (with COMMENT)

Hi Roman and Murrary,
As Roman mentioned, the IPRs of the I2NSF YANG Drafts were discussed before
and the terms of the IPRs were changed
according to the feedback from the I2NSF WG as follows:

- OLD:
Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory License to All Implementers with Possible
Royalty/Fee

https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/3557/

- NEW:
If this standard is adopted, Sungkyunkwan University (SKKU) will not assert
any patents owned or controlled by SKKU against any party for making,
using, selling, importing or offering for sale a product that implements
the standard, provided, however that SKKU retains the right to assert its
patents (including the right to claim past royalties) against any party
that asserts a patent it owns or controls (either directly or indirectly)
against SKKU or any of SKKU's affiliates or successors in title or against
any products of SKKU or any products of any of SKKU's affiliates either
alone or in combination with other products; and SKKU retains the right to
assert its patents against any product or portion thereof that is not
necessary for compliance with the standard. Royalty-bearing licenses will
be available to anyone who prefers that option.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/3607/

Thanks.

Best Regards,
Paul

On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 6:44 AM Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org> wrote:

> Hi Murray!
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: I2nsf <i2nsf-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Murray Kucherawy via
> > Datatracker
> > Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2022 1:50 AM
> > To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
> > Cc: i2nsf@ietf.org; draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model@ietf.org;
> Linda
> > Dunbar <dunbar.ll@gmail.com>; i2nsf-chairs@ietf.org
> > Subject: [I2nsf] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-
> > monitoring-data-model-15: (with COMMENT)
> >
> > Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for
> > draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-15: No Objection
> >
> > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email
> > addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory
> > paragraph, however.)
> >
> >
> > Please refer to
> https://www.ietf.org/blog/handling-iesg-ballot-positions/
> > for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> >
> >
> > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> >
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface-dm/
> >
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > COMMENT:
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > The shepherd writeup indicates that there is an IPR declaration,
> > but does not characterize the discussion about it that occurred
> > (if any).  Please update the writeup to state, or at least let the
> > IESG know by replying to this, what the outcome of this was.
>
> Please see
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i2nsf/pTemuXK-AURK99SCJ8cZ-5L3mhI/.
> There was an IPR discussion collectively across all of the I2NSF YANG
> documents.  The IPR holder actually modified their terms based on WG
> feedback.
>
> Regards,
> Roman
>
> _______________________________________________
> I2nsf mailing list
> I2nsf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf
>