Re: [I2nsf] i2nsf bof agenda - strawman proposal

["Susan Hares" <[e-mail]>]

Dan:

 

Did you mean the document: 

 

draft-dunbar-i2nsf-problem-statement-01.txt

 

I would like to talk about group-based policy (see PCIM (RFC 3060, 3460,
3644) have been adapted

I will be releasing by Monday 

1)      Draft on Policy-Base Routing Info Model (and preliminary yang model)


2)      Draft on how the PCIM (Policy Core Information Model) 

3)      I2rs use case drafts 

 

These filters were designed for the i2rs ephemeral work to react quickly to
the security threats.  This was one reason i2rs was charter. 

In 5  minutes I can give my info regarding status.  I will post a summary to
the list next week.  

 

Sue 

 

From: I2nsf [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Romascanu, Dan
(Dan)
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 1:23 PM
To: [e-mail]
Subject: [I2nsf] i2nsf bof agenda - strawman proposal

 

Hi,

 

Joe Saloway and me were entitled with the responsibility to chair the I2NSF
BOF at IETF-91. This being defined as a non-WG chartering BOF, the principal
goals are discussing the scope and use cases, assessing the level of
interest (measured by contributors and contributions) and discussing these
in order to assess if we can build a workable and focused charter to be
submitted to the IESG. 

 

We discussed with Linda and with our AD and based on their recommendations
and advice we suggest the following strawman proposal agenda for the BOF: 

 

1.       Goals of the BOF (chairs)

2.       Use Cases:

2.1 - Access Network Use Cases 

                2.2 - Edge Network Use Cases

                2.3 - Data Center Use Cases

       3. Collaboration with other industry initiatives:

                3.1 - ITU-T SG 17: "Requirements for security services based
on software-defined networking"

                3.2 - Open NFV. 

        4. Relationship with IETF existing work (SACM, midcom, nsis, pcp,
ANIMA, etc.)

        5. Possible charter of a future WG

        6. Next Steps

 

 

At this point we would like to know: 

-          Is the agenda right? Are there other contributions or proposals? 

-          Who volunteers to take ownership for the agenda items (the ones
listed and the ones to be added)

 

Monday 10/27 is also the cut-off date for I-D submissions before IETF-91. It
would be good to have I-Ds submitted for the use cases. Right now the
principal reading material is draft-dumbar-i2nsf-problem-statement-01.txt

 

Thanks and Regards,

 

Dan