IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [I2nsf] How close is draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options to publication?

Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk> Sun, 24 September 2023 17:07 UTC

Return-Path: <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E91AFC14CE5D; Sun, 24 Sep 2023 10:07:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.091, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KVLqQZEo9QBa; Sun, 24 Sep 2023 10:07:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pegasus.erg.abdn.ac.uk (pegasus.erg.abdn.ac.uk [137.50.19.135]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72B04C14CF1A; Sun, 24 Sep 2023 10:07:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.81] (fgrpf.plus.com [212.159.18.54]) by pegasus.erg.abdn.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4910F1B00062; Sun, 24 Sep 2023 18:07:05 +0100 (BST)
Message-ID: <edaa5bb8-0797-0646-09b7-c4673c87be01@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2023 18:07:04 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.0
To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>, "tsvwg-chairs@ietf.org" <tsvwg-chairs@ietf.org>
Cc: "i2nsf@ietf.org" <i2nsf@ietf.org>
References: <BN2P110MB1107E9775EB9A6155CEFC413DCFFA@BN2P110MB1107.NAMP110.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
From: Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Organization: UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN
In-Reply-To: <BN2P110MB1107E9775EB9A6155CEFC413DCFFA@BN2P110MB1107.NAMP110.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i2nsf/G5iry1wcWAipv38nJcA2ALzxm3g>
Subject: Re: [I2nsf] How close is draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options to publication?
X-BeenThere: i2nsf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "*I2NSF: Interface to Network Security Functions mailing list*" <i2nsf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/i2nsf>, <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/i2nsf/>
List-Post: <mailto:i2nsf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf>, <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2023 17:07:16 -0000

On 22/09/2023 16:53, Roman Danyliw wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I wanted to check in with you on draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options.  I'm the responsible AD for C405 (https://www.rfc-editor.org/cluster_info.php?cid=C405), a large tranche of I2NSF WG documents, and would really like to see those documents published.  However, they are sitting in MISREF waiting on two documents, one of which is draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options.
> Do you have any insight on when draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options will exit the WG?  I have no background or history on the document beyond noticing that -00 was from 2017.
>
> Thanks,
> Roman

Thanks for asking.

We have an issue tracker and it appears to be working well. It would be 
nice to think that we can now crack the last few issues for the end of 
this month (as per the milestone) and do a final WGLC. It's possible, 
but I do not know that is feasible, so the by the next IETF?

https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues

I'll do my best to encourage this to progress.

Gorry

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email