[I2nsf] Does it mean all "UDP" traffic are "BYPASS with the enum "UDP" is described as "BYPASS"

Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@huawei.com> Wed, 05 December 2018 17:47 UTC

Return-Path: <linda.dunbar@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49DDB12D4EB; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 09:47:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DTyiZvUj57dp; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 09:47:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A0E6127B92; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 09:47:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from LHREML710-CAH.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.106]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 0794D1041CB36; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 17:46:56 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from SJCEML702-CHM.china.huawei.com (10.208.112.38) by LHREML710-CAH.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 17:46:57 +0000
Received: from SJCEML521-MBB.china.huawei.com ([169.254.6.33]) by SJCEML702-CHM.china.huawei.com ([169.254.4.100]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 09:46:52 -0800
From: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@huawei.com>
To: "draft-ietf-i2nsf-sdn-ipsec-flow-protection@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-i2nsf-sdn-ipsec-flow-protection@ietf.org>, "i2nsf@ietf.org" <i2nsf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Does it mean all "UDP" traffic are "BYPASS with the enum "UDP" is described as "BYPASS"
Thread-Index: AdSMwjJHXPPXErpOQ8q1BKH0CKWowQ==
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2018 17:46:52 +0000
Message-ID: <4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F66B1F60CB@SJCEML521-MBB.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.192.11.90]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F66B1F60CBSJCEML521MBBchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i2nsf/Js1MQz5nOwTYXAuw46PZJAmhsb4>
Subject: [I2nsf] Does it mean all "UDP" traffic are "BYPASS with the enum "UDP" is described as "BYPASS"
X-BeenThere: i2nsf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "*I2NSF: Interface to Network Security Functions mailing list*" <i2nsf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/i2nsf>, <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/i2nsf/>
List-Post: <mailto:i2nsf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf>, <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2018 17:47:02 -0000

Gabriel and Rafa,

On Page 34 (Appendix A), you have the following typedef

typedef ipsec-next-layer-proto {
type enumeration {
enum TCP { description "PROTECT the traffic with IPsec"; }
enum UDP { description "BYPASS the traffic"; }
enum SCTP { description "PROTECT the traffic with IPsec";}
enum DCCP { description "PROTECT the traffic with IPsec";}
enum ICMP { description "PROTECT the traffic with IPsec";}
enum IPv6-ICMP { description "PROTECT the traffic with IPsec";}
enum MH {description "PROTECT the traffic with IPsec";}
enum GRE {description "PROTECT the traffic with IPsec";}
}
description "Next layer proto on top of IP";
}

With the following definition, does it mean all UDP traffic are "BYPASS"?
enum UDP { description "BYPASS the traffic"; }

Thanks, Linda