[I2nsf] Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model-16: (with COMMENT)

Erik Kline via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 19 July 2021 01:36 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: i2nsf@ietf.org
Delivered-To: i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 926BD3A1AD6; Sun, 18 Jul 2021 18:36:31 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Erik Kline via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model@ietf.org, i2nsf-chairs@ietf.org, i2nsf@ietf.org, Linda Dunbar <dunbar.ll@gmail.com>, dunbar.ll@gmail.com
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.34.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <162665859106.24237.1942685387031060349@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2021 18:36:31 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i2nsf/WmGw95aSLzDq29YqNZaxnDOWc_A>
Subject: [I2nsf] Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model-16: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: i2nsf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "*I2NSF: Interface to Network Security Functions mailing list*" <i2nsf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/i2nsf>, <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/i2nsf/>
List-Post: <mailto:i2nsf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf>, <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 01:36:32 -0000

Erik Kline has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model-16: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for addressing my various comments.  Clearing my discuss.

One nit:

  identity ipv6-geo-ip {
    base ipv6-capability;
    description
      "Identity for IPv4 geography condition capability";

That should probably be "Identity for IPv6 geography..."