Re: [I2nsf] [yang-doctors] Need YANG Doctor reviewing the YANG module of draft-ietf-i2nsf-sdn-ipsec-flow-protection which I2NSF is about to call WGLC

Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com> Wed, 10 April 2019 12:04 UTC

Return-Path: <mbj@tail-f.com>
X-Original-To: i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B11D120291; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 05:04:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l0RxMj3aAqR1; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 05:04:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.tail-f.com (mail.tail-f.com [46.21.102.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 858F012017B; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 05:04:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [173.38.220.61]) by mail.tail-f.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3FDEE1AE0312; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 14:04:12 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 14:04:14 +0200
Message-Id: <20190410.140414.60651087922997525.mbj@tail-f.com>
To: lhotka@nic.cz
Cc: acee@cisco.com, j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de, paul@nohats.ca, i2nsf@ietf.org, yang-doctors@ietf.org
From: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>
In-Reply-To: <bfc1838cd4d2bf626eb3977bff37b1758e5d2750.camel@nic.cz>
References: <20190410111047.2s6n5plppk6bhdc4@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de> <2DA48994-C8DB-4CCD-B87F-552AB88F35F4@cisco.com> <bfc1838cd4d2bf626eb3977bff37b1758e5d2750.camel@nic.cz>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 25.2 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i2nsf/_vuLyIKU5yci2Z5dSFGhYLSXVcQ>
Subject: Re: [I2nsf] [yang-doctors] Need YANG Doctor reviewing the YANG module of draft-ietf-i2nsf-sdn-ipsec-flow-protection which I2NSF is about to call WGLC
X-BeenThere: i2nsf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "*I2NSF: Interface to Network Security Functions mailing list*" <i2nsf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/i2nsf>, <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/i2nsf/>
List-Post: <mailto:i2nsf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf>, <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 12:04:17 -0000

Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz> wrote:
> Acee Lindem (acee) píše v St 10. 04. 2019 v 11:36 +0000:
> > 
> > On 4/10/19, 7:11 AM, "yang-doctors on behalf of Juergen Schoenwaelder" <
> > yang-doctors-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of 
> > j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> wrote:
> > 
> >     On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 07:04:30AM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> >     > On Wed, 10 Apr 2019, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> >     > 
> >     > > Not necessarily. If you look, for example, at RFC 7224, it is IANA's
> >     > > responsibility to keep the registry in sync with the YANG module. No
> > further
> >     > > effort is required from the WG that prepared the initial revision of
> > the module.
> >     > 
> >     > What is "the YANG module" ?
> >     > 
> >     > I don't think IANA has any responsibility other than RFCs directing them
> >     > to update IANA registries. How do you imagine any updates to happen, and
> >     > how would IANA "sync" this automatically?
> >     >
> >     
> >     There are IANA maintained YANG modules (and before we had YANG there
> >     were IANA maintained MIB modules). Numbers maintained in registries
> >     sometimes need to be in machine readable formats and then IANA
> >     documents procedures to make updates both in their internal registry
> >     and in an IANA maintained YANG module.
> > 
> > It seems this could all be done with tooling. However, AFAIK, generation of
> > new versions of IANA YANG models had not be implemented yet.
> 
> If it is so, then we have work to do. I am going to open this issue in the
> NETMOD mailing list.

Hold on.  IANA do publish new revisions of the YANG modules when the
registries are updated.  (perhaps they have a manual process, but
that's not really the point of this thread).



/martin




> 
> Lada
> 
> >  
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Acee
> > 
> > 
> >     
> >     /js
> >     
> >     -- 
> >     Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
> >     Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
> >     Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <https://www.jacobs-university.de/>
> >     
> >     _______________________________________________
> >     yang-doctors mailing list
> >     yang-doctors@ietf.org
> >     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yang-doctors
> >     
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > yang-doctors mailing list
> > yang-doctors@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yang-doctors
> -- 
> Ladislav Lhotka
> Head, CZ.NIC Labs
> PGP Key ID: 0xB8F92B08A9F76C67
> 
> _______________________________________________
> yang-doctors mailing list
> yang-doctors@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yang-doctors