[I2nsf] Do we need a WG session for IETF 105?
Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@huawei.com> Wed, 15 May 2019 16:55 UTC
Return-Path: <linda.dunbar@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EDD21202CB for <i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 May 2019 09:55:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kSIIwE_VBp7Z for <i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 May 2019 09:55:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85B6912016C for <i2nsf@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 May 2019 09:55:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.106]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 700728260D945D39AF16 for <i2nsf@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 May 2019 17:55:23 +0100 (IST)
Received: from SJCEML703-CHM.china.huawei.com (10.208.112.39) by lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.45) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Wed, 15 May 2019 17:55:23 +0100
Received: from SJCEML521-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.183]) by SJCEML703-CHM.china.huawei.com ([169.254.5.166]) with mapi id 14.03.0439.000; Wed, 15 May 2019 09:55:20 -0700
From: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@huawei.com>
To: "i2nsf@ietf.org" <i2nsf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Do we need a WG session for IETF 105?
Thread-Index: AdULO6y6FRiSenj+Rtq714Vdq+Bopg==
Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 16:55:19 +0000
Message-ID: <4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F66B3D44A8@sjceml521-mbs.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.192.11.82]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F66B3D44A8sjceml521mbschi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i2nsf/vGAHmCQzGyj39gjKKUaztB4mQjs>
Subject: [I2nsf] Do we need a WG session for IETF 105?
X-BeenThere: i2nsf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "*I2NSF: Interface to Network Security Functions mailing list*" <i2nsf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/i2nsf>, <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/i2nsf/>
List-Post: <mailto:i2nsf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf>, <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 16:55:27 -0000
Please let us know if you would need WG session presentation in IETF105. If there is no presentation requests, we will not request I2NSF WG session in IETF105. Linda & Yoav
- [I2nsf] Do we need a WG session for IETF 105? Linda Dunbar
- Re: [I2nsf] Do we need a WG session for IETF 105? Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong