Re: [I2nsf] Will definitions related to "Attestation" to be added to I2NSF terminology draft? and the survey msg?

[John Strassner <[e-mail]>]

Hi Linda,

I will start on these in the middle of next week. I am happy to coordinate
the editing as usual; however, attestation will need input from Henk and
Diego.

regards,
John

On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 8:25 AM, Linda Dunbar <[e-mail]>
wrote:

> John, Sue, Diego, Frank, and Henk,
>
>
>
> During the I2NSF terminology discussion at I2NSF WG session in IETF98,
> there were some discussions on if terminologies related to Attestation need
> to be added to the terminology draft. Want to ask if there is any plan to
> add them.
>
> The IETF 98 meeting notes also have the following:
>
>
>
> - Need to explore metadata more (its use in netmod is not aligned with
> that of other SDOs)
>
> - Need to explore Events
>
>   - should we differentiate between event types (e.g., alarms vs.
> threshold crossings) or assume that all are equal?
>
>   - how robust a definition is needed?
>
> - Would like to see if terminology can help mismatch between info and data
> models
>
>
>
> AI: start list email threads on the list of issues presented
>
>
>
> Just checking if those issues will be addressed.
>
>
>
> Thanks, Linda
>
>
>



-- 
regards,
John