IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [I2nsf] Progress with draft-ietf-i2nsf-framework-05

Robert Moskowitz <rgm-ietf@htt-consult.com> Tue, 30 May 2017 18:24 UTC

Return-Path: <rgm-ietf@htt-consult.com>
X-Original-To: i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0FB2126D73 for <i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 May 2017 11:24:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aIZAcpCJUBgs for <i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 May 2017 11:24:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from z9m9z.htt-consult.com (z9m9z.htt-consult.com [50.253.254.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B5BF1293FF for <i2nsf@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 May 2017 11:24:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by z9m9z.htt-consult.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19A9362208; Tue, 30 May 2017 14:24:52 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at htt-consult.com
Received: from z9m9z.htt-consult.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (z9m9z.htt-consult.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id T1l+HR5XHogC; Tue, 30 May 2017 14:24:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from lx120e.htt-consult.com (108-204-105-172.lightspeed.cicril.sbcglobal.net [108.204.105.172]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by z9m9z.htt-consult.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3422662207; Tue, 30 May 2017 14:24:43 -0400 (EDT)
To: adrian@olddog.co.uk, i2nsf@ietf.org
References: <083101d2cfff$158a7010$409f5030$@olddog.co.uk>
From: Robert Moskowitz <rgm-ietf@htt-consult.com>
Message-ID: <cdd67283-e604-05b4-6d07-0bdbea9088a6@htt-consult.com>
Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 13:24:26 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <083101d2cfff$158a7010$409f5030$@olddog.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i2nsf/z_fSWkFsxFHDuovjPU-YSYJ7_fU>
Subject: Re: [I2nsf] Progress with draft-ietf-i2nsf-framework-05
X-BeenThere: i2nsf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "*I2NSF: Interface to Network Security Functions mailing list*" <i2nsf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/i2nsf>, <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/i2nsf/>
List-Post: <mailto:i2nsf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf>, <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 18:24:57 -0000

I should complete my review mid next week.  But I suspect it will be 
nits.  I was quite comfortable with it earlier.

Frank is ahead of me...

Bob

On 05/18/2017 12:49 PM, Adrian Farrel wrote:
> Hi WG,
>
> I am about to do a document shepherd review prior to starting a WG last call. In
> conversation with Linda just now I think I spotted a few areas where I am going
> to make chunky suggestions for additional text, but overall the document looks
> sound.
>
> If you care deeply about this work and haven't looked at the framework for a
> while, now would be a good time. Don't wait for WG last call.
>
> Thanks,
> Adrian
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> I2nsf mailing list
> I2nsf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email