IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [i2rs] Agenda for IETF 91 - Honolulu uploaded

Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com> Mon, 10 November 2014 07:34 UTC

Return-Path: <mbj@tail-f.com>
X-Original-To: i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4BB51A88A8 for <i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 Nov 2014 23:34:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.495
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.495 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M6_WMgD-7qNQ for <i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 Nov 2014 23:34:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.tail-f.com (mail.tail-f.com [83.241.162.140]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 402DA1A00BE for <i2rs@ietf.org>; Sun, 9 Nov 2014 23:34:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (x15.tail-f.com [192.168.1.60]) by mail.tail-f.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4C7DC1280B12; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 08:34:23 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 08:34:23 +0100
Message-Id: <20141110.083423.2050092211582610437.mbj@tail-f.com>
To: jhaas@pfrc.org
From: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>
In-Reply-To: <20141109234211.GA11673@pfrc>
References: <20141109234211.GA11673@pfrc>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.5 on Emacs 23.4 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i2rs/6FHwDXwpHV_9lLN1IoRKoUCYU0o
Cc: i2rs@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [i2rs] Agenda for IETF 91 - Honolulu uploaded
X-BeenThere: i2rs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Interface to The Internet Routing System \(IRS\)" <i2rs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/i2rs>, <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/i2rs/>
List-Post: <mailto:i2rs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs>, <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 07:34:28 -0000

Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> wrote:
> One item I would like to proactively draw the working group's attention to
> is the mount-point drafts:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-clemm-netmod-mount-02
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-voit-netmod-peer-mount-requirements-00
> (Note that Cisco has asserted IPR against these drafts.)
> These drafts, while not specifically targeting I2RS use cases, cover some of
> the same underlying issues as the I2RS ephemeral state requirements.

Jeff, can you elaborate?  I don't understand how the mount technique
is related to I2RS ephemeral state.  mount is a way to incorporate
data from some datastore into another, and this seems to be orthogonal
to I2RS requirements for ephemeral state.


/martin

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email