[i2rs] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-i2rs-rib-info-model-15: (with COMMENT)
Suresh Krishnan <suresh@kaloom.com> Thu, 05 April 2018 05:08 UTC
Return-Path: <suresh@kaloom.com>
X-Original-To: i2rs@ietf.org
Delivered-To: i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F864126C26; Wed, 4 Apr 2018 22:08:18 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Suresh Krishnan <suresh@kaloom.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-i2rs-rib-info-model@ietf.org, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, i2rs-chairs@ietf.org, shares@ndzh.com, i2rs@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.77.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <152290489812.25948.2495908999143424774.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2018 22:08:18 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i2rs/UeQ7LO_9ovG5RjHYpHUMhsZDL2Q>
Subject: [i2rs] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-i2rs-rib-info-model-15: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: i2rs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: "Interface to The Internet Routing System \(IRS\)" <i2rs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/i2rs>, <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/i2rs/>
List-Post: <mailto:i2rs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs>, <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2018 05:08:18 -0000
Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-i2rs-rib-info-model-15: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-rib-info-model/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- * Section 2.3. Regarding the OSPF route for 2001:DB8::1/32 Did you mean 2001:DB8::1/128 for the host route? If not, this example is wrong since 2001:DB8::1/32 expands to 2001:DB8:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:1/32 -> 2001:DB8::/32 as the route * Figure 4. Shouldn't the tunnel-encap and tunnel-decap also loop the packet back into nexthop processing just like the derived nexthops do? * Section 6 I would have expected the match type to have some indication about whether it requires an exact match or LPM (e.g. A MAC route uses an exact match but an IPv6 route uses LPM). Has the WG discussed this?
- [i2rs] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ie… Suresh Krishnan
- Re: [i2rs] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draf… Susan Hares
- Re: [i2rs] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draf… Susan Hares
- Re: [i2rs] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draf… Suresh Krishnan
- Re: [i2rs] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draf… Nitin Bahadur
- Re: [i2rs] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draf… Susan Hares