Re: [i2rs] Copies of drafts that will be posted after the meeting
"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Thu, 05 March 2015 15:14 UTC
Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F4031A03C7 for <i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 07:14:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Yyfz0yW3NE1F for <i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 07:14:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-8.cisco.com (alln-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.142.95]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F4BE1A0155 for <i2rs@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 07:12:53 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=6242; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1425568373; x=1426777973; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=i7m8d/eTaUH4OAAp634OY92wojCBAHYXDObHc10oVUE=; b=H+uFh9WeYX0Jdw2mZDQfNSMThZEimhdLf/8DvvuORvqHqREx7rTrW6si FgOOA0hnmg9yVxhj07pLhpIWVkYDLjxsK8JQ4a3IGH/PsxwL79MCfzJsW PQOJW54AkzWZho4xMPsvv9/voH0EdUWcAqU/nABQypBbhQqCllzC+3ks5 k=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DaBAAccfhU/5BdJa1agkNDUloEv2qHOQKBNjgUAQEBAQEBAXyEDwEBAQQtTBACAQgOAwMBAigHMhQJCAEBBAENBYgv120BAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEXixSEXREHhCsFkAWJTYEagyaLbINAI4ICHIFQb4ECJB5/AQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,347,1422921600"; d="scan'208,217";a="129165570"
Received: from rcdn-core-8.cisco.com ([173.37.93.144]) by alln-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP; 05 Mar 2015 15:12:52 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x01.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x01.cisco.com [173.36.12.75]) by rcdn-core-8.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t25FCque006358 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 5 Mar 2015 15:12:52 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x06.cisco.com ([169.254.1.175]) by xhc-aln-x01.cisco.com ([173.36.12.75]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 09:12:52 -0600
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "i2rs@ietf.org" <i2rs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [i2rs] Copies of drafts that will be posted after the meeting
Thread-Index: AdBXOI0o3KFyAxj9T6qJ7vcS/vpADgAJq80A
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 15:12:51 +0000
Message-ID: <D11DDB83.FDCA%acee@cisco.com>
References: <0bbb01d05739$d5c31a30$81494e90$@ndzh.com>
In-Reply-To: <0bbb01d05739$d5c31a30$81494e90$@ndzh.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.196]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D11DDB83FDCAaceeciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i2rs/XhwnRylCgAUMEKIK_l3TwiprAOU>
Cc: 'Jeffrey Haas' <jhaas@pfrc.org>
Subject: Re: [i2rs] Copies of drafts that will be posted after the meeting
X-BeenThere: i2rs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Interface to The Internet Routing System \(IRS\)" <i2rs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/i2rs>, <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/i2rs/>
List-Post: <mailto:i2rs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs>, <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 15:14:05 -0000
Hi Sue, Actually, it was the service topology DM attached to your original post that had the problem (draft-wang-i2rs-yang-service-topo-dm-01.txt.pdf). I guess I did wonder why it wasn’t a RIB model as well and should have indicated that as well. The RIB DM PDF file may well be ok. Thanks, Acee From: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com<mailto:shares@ndzh.com>> Date: Thursday, March 5, 2015 at 6:45 AM To: "i2rs@ietf.org<mailto:i2rs@ietf.org>" <i2rs@ietf.org<mailto:i2rs@ietf.org>> Cc: Jeff Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org<mailto:jhaas@pfrc.org>> Subject: [i2rs] Copies of drafts that will be posted after the meeting Hi all: This is a temporary version of the I2RS RIB Information model and the Yang Data Model. This version is for reference during our interim meeting this morning. Final versions of these drafts will be available by March 9th. The RIB design team was hard at work this last week aligning the Informational Draft for the I2RS and the Yang data Model for the I2RS RIB. Unfortunately, due to our multi-time zone team – not all members of the team have reviewed theses drafts. I’m sure the authors would love any review comments – but please be aware these drafts are preliminary and sent to the WG at the chair’s request. Sue
- [i2rs] Copies of drafts that will be posted after… Susan Hares
- Re: [i2rs] Copies of drafts that will be posted a… Acee Lindem (acee)