Re: [irs-discuss] Use Cases Draft First Cut

Hi Russ,

The draft is interesting and IMO, I cannot give any feedback if there
are references but not shown. I suggest that at least [1-5] references
that you see is the most important for the draft to be given on the
list.

AB
----
On 9/19/12, Russ White <russw@riw.us> wrote:
> Y'all:
>
> Last night I published a new draft on use cases for IRS. Please read and
> send comments!
>
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-white-irs-use-case/
>
> Several points to consider:
>
> 1. I've left all references out at the moment. I suspect this text is
> going to be changing a good bit; putting references in at this early of
> a stage invites reference mismatches through major text revisions.
>
> 2. I've left out a couple of suggested use cases. I think we need to
> focus on use cases that reach beyond currently available mechanisms, and
> show interaction between multiple pieces of an overall system.
>
> 3. I've worded some summary points in requirements language,
> specifically using SHOULD in a couple of places. We need to think about
> whether or not these types of references are "proper" in a use cases
> draft of this sort.
>
> 4. The text is probably still rough around the edges --I've focused more
> on the justification for the work in the introduction than on the actual
> text of the use cases. I'm certain the text in the actual use cases will
> harden as we get comments and edit those sections.
>
> Again, please read and make comments!
>
> Russ
>
> --
> <><
> riwhite@verisign.com
> russw@riw.us
> _______________________________________________
> irs-discuss mailing list
> irs-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/irs-discuss
>