Re: [i2rs] I2RS topology is generic?

[Alia Atlas <[e-mail]>]

Hi Benoit,

Yes, as is clearly articulated in the draft,it is a generic topology into
which all other topology-related work should
plug.

I2RS and Alex are very happy to hear comments and reviews of that draft.

Regards,
Alia

On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 4:50 PM, Benoit Claise <[e-mail]> wrote:

>  Dear Alia,
>
> I would need your guidance. On my side, I'm trying to help the SUPA people
> with the scope of their work.
>
> During a SUPA call during which Sue explained the I2RS work (thanks again
> Sue), she answered a key question: any topology work should be based on the
> I2RS topology draft (draft-clemm-i2rs-yang-network-topo draft). This draft
> was called the generic topology model draft.
>
> Discussing further with the SUPA BoF chairs, it was observed that the I2RS
> charter doesn't mention it's a generic topology model. So please let us
> know what your intention is. Is this L3 topology a generic one, into which
> all others topology-related work should plug?
>
> The SUPA requirement is a way to express topology at several layers of
> abstraction (granularity).
>
> Regards, Benoit
>
>
>