[i2rs] draft-hares-i2rs-bgp-compare-yang - comparison of two BGP yang modules
"Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com> Fri, 24 October 2014 16:11 UTC
Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1D111A1BC2 for <i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 09:11:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.946
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.946 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DNNtQezliduY for <i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 09:11:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (hhc-web3.hickoryhill-consulting.com [64.9.205.143]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 885571A0271 for <i2rs@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 09:11:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=64.112.195.202;
From: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
To: i2rs@ietf.org
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 12:11:50 -0400
Message-ID: <04fa01cfefa5$398ba890$aca2f9b0$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_04FB_01CFEF83.B27AF2F0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Content-Language: en-us
Thread-Index: Ac/vpQ0e5G37M1UQT6W4fKmoX+XlGQ==
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i2rs/lCaAbLD7fhcw3wFAYpNruiW-a9M
Cc: 'Jeffrey Haas' <jhaas@pfrc.org>, edc.ietf@gmail.com
Subject: [i2rs] draft-hares-i2rs-bgp-compare-yang - comparison of two BGP yang modules
X-BeenThere: i2rs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Interface to The Internet Routing System \(IRS\)" <i2rs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/i2rs>, <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/i2rs/>
List-Post: <mailto:i2rs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs>, <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 16:11:59 -0000
A Draft comparing the following two yang modules https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zhdankin-netmod-bgp-cfg/ (config) https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wang-i2rs-bgp-dm/ (i2rs state-focused) is at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hares-i2rs-bgp-compare-yang/ The draft compares the two yang modules against each other, and against the I2rs bgp use case requirements. A summary of draft is: zdhankin draft (98% config, 2% status), wang (98% status, 2% config). Need wang draft to fulfill i2 bpg use case requirements. I'm looking for feedback on the comparison. Sue