[i2rs] Brian Haberman's Abstain on draft-ietf-i2rs-problem-statement-10: (with COMMENT)

"Brian Haberman" <brian@innovationslab.net> Wed, 17 February 2016 18:23 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20160217182323.29775.57858.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 10:23:23 -0800
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i2rs/lWOo4c0XJlFDkRBTkNhJWcDNjic>
Cc: i2rs@ietf.org, bill.wu@huawei.com, draft-ietf-i2rs-problem-statement@ietf.org, i2rs-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: [i2rs] Brian Haberman's Abstain on draft-ietf-i2rs-problem-statement-10: (with COMMENT)

Brian Haberman has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-i2rs-problem-statement-10: Abstain

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-problem-statement/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

My position on these types of documents should be pretty clear at this
point. The parts that do have archival value should be published as a
part of a protocol specification or architecture document.

[i2rs] Brian Haberman's Abstain on draft-ietf-i2r… Brian Haberman
Re: [i2rs] Brian Haberman's Abstain on draft-ietf… Susan Hares