[i2rs] 2 week WG LC for draft-ietf-i2rs-traceabilty

["Susan Hares" <[e-mail]>]

This begins a 2 week WG LC for
<http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-traceability/>
draft-ietf-i2rs-traceability-02 from (5/26 to 6/9)  

(http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-traceability/) 

 

I2RS Status: WG LC (5/26 to 6/9) 

 

Carlos, joe, and Gonzalo - please indicate whether you know of any IPR on
this draft. 

 

 

This document is a companion to three other documents for I2RS requirements
which have WG calls: 

 

1)      This begins a 2 week adoption call for
draft-haas-i2rs-ephemeral-state-req: 

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-haas-i2rs-ephemeral-state-reqs/

 

  This document covers requests to the netmod and netconf Working

   Groups for functionality to support the ephemeral state requirements

   to implement the I2RS architecture.

 

Status: WG adoption call (5/26 to 6/9) 

 

2)
<http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-haas-i2rs-netmod-netconf-requirements
/> draft-haas-i2rs-netmod-netconf-requirements-01 

http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-haas-i2rs-netmod-netconf-requirements/

 

[This draft is an early set of requirements from which the ephemeral state
and "identity, secondary-identity and priority" were pulled into
draft-haas-i2rs-ephemeral-state-reqs.  The  notification-subscription were
pulled into the draft-ietf-i2rs-pub-sub-requirments.   The traceability had
been separated before draft-haas-i2rs-nemod-netconf-requirements was
published. This draft remains the only source for mutual authentication
requirements (section 2.2), transaction requirements, and the history of the
discussion.   This draft is being requested to be adopted as a general
roadmap for the I2RS WG. In the future, the I2RS WG will accept more
detailed specification on the mutual authentication or the transaction
protocol. 

 

I2RS Status: WG Adoption (5/26 to 6/9) 

 

3)      draf-ietf-i2rs-pub-sub-requirements-02. 

 

http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-pub-sub-requirements/

 

I2RS Status: WG LC (5/26 to 6/9) 

 

 

This thread is to discuss WG consensus on
<http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-traceability/>
draft-ietf-i2rs-traceability-02 .  Please discuss the merits of the
traceability framework described in this draft as being part of the
requirements forwarded to netmod/netconf.   Also discuss if this framework
provides the necessary things for I2RS deployment. 

 

This draft will also be forwarded as part of the requirements to the IESG. 

 

Sue Hares