[i2rs] WG adoption - draft-hares-i2rs-auth-trans-04 (8/17 to 8/31)

["Susan Hares" <[e-mail]>]

This is a 2 week WG adoption call for the draft-hares-i2rs-auth-trans-04.txt
which provides the security requirements for the I2RS protocol.  

 

To be adopted, this draft does not need to be perfect, but a good direction
for the I2RS protocol security. 

 

Please note that Juergen's review of this draft has the following feedback:

.       Requirements 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 9, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20 - were
ok, 

.       Editorial requirements 3 and 4 need clarifications on words, and
requirement 10 is ambiguous, and 

.       Requirements 8, 12, and the multiple message sequence (was req-17)
are not security protocols, 

.       Technical question: Why should we support an insecure protocol. 

 

A security directorate reviewer will review this draft starting on 8/20.  I
will post these reviews and the document changes.  Please suggest changes to
requirement 3, 4, and 10; and if I2RS should support an insecure protocol. 

 

Once we get the security reviewers feedback on 8, 12, and the multiple
messages - I will post the feedback and we'll discuss real time. 

 

Sue Hares