Re: [i2rs] Comments on draft-white-i2rs-use-case-02

Jeff:

Thanks for the suggestion on the distributed reaction to the network, and
catching /IRS/I2RS/.   

Could you just give me a short example of what you mean by enumerate the
capabilities? 

Thanks,

Sue 

-----Original Message-----
From: i2rs [mailto:i2rs-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Haas
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2014 6:25 PM
To: i2rs@ietf.org
Cc: draft-white-i2rs-use-case@tools.ietf.org
Subject: [i2rs] Comments on draft-white-i2rs-use-case-02

A few quick comments on draft -02:

In section 2 (Distributed Reaction to Network Based Attacks), there is an
implicit knowledge that the router in question supports policy based
routing.  While an extremely common feature these days, it's not guaranteed
to be there.  I'd suggest that this capability needs to be reported to I2RS.

The document still mentions IRS. :-)

The summaries of capabilities and interactions are nice, but it'd be
helpful, I think, to enumerate them.  This would let common requirements be
a bit more visible across the use cases.

-- Jeff

_______________________________________________
i2rs mailing list
i2rs@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs