Re: [Ianaplan] Transition update from ICANN53

Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> Wed, 08 July 2015 18:29 UTC

Return-Path: <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A61B61A6FF1 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 11:29:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a0-FEeJZlQ_S for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 11:29:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx2.yitter.info (mx2.yitter.info [IPv6:2600:3c03::f03c:91ff:fedf:cfab]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 875511A6FEC for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 11:29:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx2.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1838D1000B for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 18:29:06 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at crankycanuck.ca
Received: from mx2.yitter.info ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx2.yitter.info [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l5wy8bp_wy9q for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 18:29:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx2.yitter.info (c-50-169-68-91.hsd1.nh.comcast.net [50.169.68.91]) by mx2.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 18AE3105DB for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 18:29:05 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2015 14:29:03 -0400
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
To: ianaplan@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20150708182903.GP58386@mx2.yitter.info>
References: <39675F69-8FCC-47E5-9C5D-600F1B0AA64A@piuha.net> <559C474B.1010803@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <559C474B.1010803@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/eleDXqf-E9PDng0xs-sh-ms2gLA>
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] Transition update from ICANN53
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2015 18:29:09 -0000

Hi Brian,

On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 09:40:27AM +1200, Brian E Carpenter wrote:

> on this, or do we simply defer it? And if we defer it, do we defer
> it to the IAOC and Trust as an operational question, or do we keep
> IANAPLAN alive but sleeping?

Just my personal opinion, but in my experience deciding what to do
before you really must cuts off options that you otherwise might have
liked.  So I would suggest that we each think about these things,
follow the discussions if interested, and hang on until all of us find
out that we must make some decisions.  We have consensus on a strong
position that is widely hailed as a good and wise one.  Let us cleave
to that until we find we must alter our opinions.

Best regards,

A (again, for myself)

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@anvilwalrusden.com