[Iasa20] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc7776bis-02: (with COMMENT)
Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 04 September 2019 17:52 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: iasa20@ietf.org
Delivered-To: iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75E4F120B25; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 10:52:48 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc7776bis@ietf.org, Jon Peterson <jon.peterson@team.neustar>, iasa2-chairs@ietf.org, jon.peterson@team.neustar, iasa20@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.100.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
Message-ID: <156761956840.22758.9960963672513876043.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2019 10:52:48 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iasa20/958-unBNy_8YRJX_jVVvoleHwIw>
Subject: [Iasa20] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc7776bis-02: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: iasa20@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Discussions relating to reorganising the IETF administrative structures in the so called IASA 2.0 project. <iasa20.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/iasa20>, <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/iasa20/>
List-Post: <mailto:iasa20@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iasa20>, <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2019 17:52:49 -0000
Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc7776bis-02: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc7776bis/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- (1) +1 on Barry Leiba’s COMMENT about updating meta-data (2) A few nits: -- Multiple places. Typo. s/Adminstrative/Administrative/g -- Section 2.3. Consistent spacing/typo. s/obmudsteam/Ombudsteam/.
- [Iasa20] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ie… Roman Danyliw via Datatracker