IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Iasa20] problem statement needed

Joseph Lorenzo Hall <joe@cdt.org> Tue, 18 July 2017 15:17 UTC

Return-Path: <jhall@cdt.org>
X-Original-To: iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88398131686 for <iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 08:17:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cdt.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vW826IHjX4Bq for <iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 08:17:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ua0-x22c.google.com (mail-ua0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c08::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FD8F128DE5 for <iasa20@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 08:17:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ua0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id y47so12070090uag.0 for <iasa20@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 08:17:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cdt.org; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=VIcs50/x75cIuvyGdu5NwQZQ1CAqRNrRr/nWTKgGg/I=; b=DfrX0cxvaxdHmwClAPjTgOGROFbcABHZt2/P8+6laYb9EIgmXRKWWWe1duWzSVpNZC yVDylFenNQoXHOvBhpcDfLiVuikmdIk7OJRAPbw4iTqDFDqRbe0ijiaj7T4DtZkaqMA/ p2bG1H7J9+IBnzpN+DU9RMUvy63QqUyBrRJC0=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=VIcs50/x75cIuvyGdu5NwQZQ1CAqRNrRr/nWTKgGg/I=; b=arNsGexkgcZ7DFyJbXeWzTior9ScX5+s2rJkdPwLheFS+D7OpzsReO5J/xEHI19Y39 9YsdG0RlZXlu6Dz0lC/6NQl8hGejcPHeXJYFy/B/ooxPzmsA69x+FT3WISLsb0tiugma xpEIb2RLagmck8w+5HvsYeJ3jKEyjY/0TLViGeshVd31X8138zMR2xuChrw/+65LG926 0SLFV/ZshfaxcHCmg3uZzhwJ4lHEvTpN7QFD3whTw7Ko4k/68h9pJBIfqeIzPoBYguCp D+EWlCNDFmZ3mvFDeUx5CDdxp/OwFaHj/pQQubCEOGCauxWiv04TC7CqYW6YMW/pV8WX Ooxw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw112mH9JtAtl7lCWDGLGQY/5BK09voHCiAFluLsyo5LfXZ1+QaJQ7 jDoFwhe6Kb9uWS2cbuAbtV17oApQwd0w
X-Received: by 10.159.36.138 with SMTP id 10mr1133225uar.47.1500391035424; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 08:17:15 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.103.72.137 with HTTP; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 08:16:54 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <FBABE063-4AC6-455D-8D69-915370351705@consulintel.es>
References: <FBABE063-4AC6-455D-8D69-915370351705@consulintel.es>
From: Joseph Lorenzo Hall <joe@cdt.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 17:16:54 +0200
Message-ID: <CABtrr-XFuho=i7x=DZhKu0tXz=98wcpS3ZPs_to=d_+i2ENLsQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
Cc: iasa20@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113cfbf4b13f3e055499027d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iasa20/FFFlcYj7TqpxuWL4ofOar_zOvD8>
Subject: Re: [Iasa20] problem statement needed
X-BeenThere: iasa20@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions relating to reorganising the IETF administrative structures in the so called “IASA 2.0” project. <iasa20.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/iasa20>, <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/iasa20/>
List-Post: <mailto:iasa20@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iasa20>, <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 15:17:18 -0000

There is this, but we will draft something that is a separate and crisp
problem statement:

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hall-iasa20-workshops-report-00

best, Joe

On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 5:02 PM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <
jordi.palet@consulintel.es> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> After the meeting, I chatted with a few folks and I think most of us agree
> that we are missing a key piece to move on before doing anything else.
>
> May be there is a document already, I didn’t found it (I’ve read a couple
> of IDs, one from Leslie and another one from Jari, but even do) … can we
> define the problem?
>
> Is just the IAOC overload, is a more clear separation of tasks, is the
> interface with ISOC or the ISOC board? Is all that?
>
> I really think we need to step back before moving on.
>
> Regards,
> Jordi
>
>
>
>
> **********************************************
> IPv4 is over
> Are you ready for the new Internet ?
> http://www.consulintel.es
> The IPv6 Company
>
> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or
> confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the
> individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware
> that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this
> information, including attached files, is prohibited.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> iasa20 mailing list
> iasa20@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iasa20
>



-- 
Joseph Lorenzo Hall
Chief Technologist, Center for Democracy & Technology [https://www.cdt.org]
1401 K ST NW STE 200, Washington DC 20005-3497
e: joe@cdt.org, p: 202.407.8825, pgp: https://josephhall.org/gpg-key
Fingerprint: 3CA2 8D7B 9F6D DBD3 4B10  1607 5F86 6987 40A9 A871

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email