Re: [Iasa20] Barry Leiba's Yes on draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc2031bis-05: (with COMMENT)

"Livingood, Jason" <> Thu, 22 August 2019 20:45 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D9B0120C28 for <>; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 13:45:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R8HFFGodSxfU for <>; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 13:45:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A571120C38 for <>; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 13:45:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256;; s=20190412; c=relaxed/simple; q=dns/txt;; t=1566506715; x=2430420315; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:CC:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=CfcsXaXhvCnzNfWMCT9dZCR/mrwIXOTgtOl0ZBkjEcA=; b=S4N/mIdx5+rnfIHGoGCfhvhwcBdFsBgqe60avBozdapl0b1A4Z9nl56+y5wEiOBA vRUJ3XS1oqPHiuSCu1cd2EaPhNSE4jKvbZi6KaAL00ddbgWy1Wjwx6ilXnCLyGxA x9v1zkuK+UlKAto3PLfoMK/fxzNzrNxfg7REVOywbyxmIQNHcBfUhp0qiyhty/CS fnGft3iYWrLo06RMwKpy32gVjVKrN4v6YpA6C4lI6ZmftRMO6ADivdLKmp6cLcaR TOTPQcND2op+RgkgxX654E1yzW6qK2cuyAfB2izjFAbVHcMi8uNnaI/fdri7ZVRd r0OTyrsHv6jGfTmvBXhJcg==;
X-AuditID: a2962c47-a9fff7000002e144-cd-5d5efedb2a53
Received: from ( []) (using TLS with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by (SMTP Gateway) with SMTP id 7A.73.57668.BDEFE5D5; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 14:45:15 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1713.5; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 16:45:31 -0400
Received: from ([fe80::3aea:a7ff:fe36:8a94]) by ([fe80::3aea:a7ff:fe36:8a94%15]) with mapi id 15.01.1713.008; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 16:45:31 -0400
From: "Livingood, Jason" <>
To: Barry Leiba <>, The IESG <>
CC: "" <>, Jon Peterson <>, "" <>, "" <>
Thread-Topic: Barry Leiba's Yes on draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc2031bis-05: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHVTaTFbBIYEDsxg0Gg2pb6OpIQMacHuceA
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 20:45:31 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.1c.0.190812
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Forward
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFtrPKsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsWSUDRnsu7tf3GxBj1rpCwOLb7EarH9wGtG i96739ktlkzfyGQx489EZoszDZYObB4tq3qZPZYs+cnksaPhOXMAc1QDo01JRlFqYolLalpq XnGqHZcCBrBJSk3LL0p1TSzKqQxKzUlNxK4MpDIlNSezLLVIH6sx+ljNSehiyvj1/yxbwRTZ ijMNvawNjFtkuhg5OSQETCQ6r0xl7GLk4hASOMIk8aFvP5TTwiSx+dRTFgjnNKPEltZ7rCAt bAJmEncXXmEGsUUEnCXeXPrDBFLELHCNUWLf3/dsIAlhgSCJjb33oIqCJXacXMcCYRtJbGhr YwSxWQRUJdrPzwOr4RVwkTjx7yxQnANom69E1xZDkDCngJ/E/t+3mEBsRgExie+n1oDZzALi EreezGeCeEFAYsme88wQtqjEy8f/wO4UFdCXWPJjMyvISAkBeYmPc5lATGYBTYn1u/QhplhJ THp7gQ3CVpSY0v2QHeIYQYmTM5+wQEwUlzh8ZAfrBEbJWUgWz0KYNAvJpFlIJs1CMmkBI+sq Rl5DMyM9Q1MDPRMTPXPDTYzAZLVomo77DsYP52MPMQpwMCrx8Lo+j4sVYk0sK67MPcQowcGs JMJbNhEoxJuSWFmVWpQfX1Sak1p8iFGag0VJnPduV2yskEB6YklqdmpqQWoRTJaJg1OqgZHj q6li2Nkb8/c+ObeuV+Rv/GbbLzt+/ul5PeFhZ8XfRd1Bt9zs9NUU5Dbkqe1SjlayfyXDG3P+ kPekVyyydx3+5R98/srhqPWC7deVch4JmJxR5at7GML8yfV2FBtbj8pkLed/i1dtt5j4NEgr vvzn87QC6Y/Ht3xxaN59dOKrvXsPvt0kMmOREktxRqKhFnNRcSIAv45LllIDAAA=
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Iasa20] Barry Leiba's Yes on draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc2031bis-05: (with COMMENT)
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: =?iso-8859-1?q?Discussions_relating_to_reorganising_the_IETF_administrative_structures_in_the_so_called_=93IASA_2=2E0=94_project=2E?= <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 20:45:35 -0000

I seem to have missed this for the -06 update so posting a -07 in a second to address these changes. 


On 8/8/19, 12:50 AM, "Barry Leiba via Datatracker" <> wrote:

    Barry Leiba has entered the following ballot position for
    draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc2031bis-05: Yes
    When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
    email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
    introductory paragraph, however.)
    Please refer to
    for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
    The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
    I find the wording in Section 2 to be a bit odd: it sounds like it’s saying
    that things have always been the case before, but are perhaps so no longer. 
    Can we re-word it a little to make it clear that these aspects have not
    changed, though other details of the relationship have?  Maybe something like
    this (adjust as you see appropriate):
”ISOC and the IETF have historically been and remain philosophically aligned.
     ISOC's connection with the IETF community has always played an important role
     in its policy work.  ISOC has always been an advocate for multistakeholder
     processes, which include the technical community.  These have not changed, and
     open standards are an explicit part of one of the focus areas in ISOC's
     mission: Advancing the development and application of Internet infrastructure,
     technologies, and open standards.”
    Where Section 4 cites RFC 7437, it should cite 7437bis.
    While I always find British spellings delightful, ISOC’s own web site uses
    “program” (see, for example,  We should be
    consistent with that.
    The first sentence of Section 7 leads me to expect the paragraph to continue
    talking about funding from ISOC, but it has nothing further to do with that.  I
    suggest a paragraph break after the first sentence, and removing ”in
    particular” from the second.
       Note that it is possible
       that some of those services are provided by ISOC or involve ISOC
    I would say “may be provided”.  Does that not feel better?