Re: [iccrg] ICCRG meeting minutes

[hiren panchasara <[e-mail]>]

On 04/13/16 at 06:59P, Michael Tuexen wrote:
> 
> > On 13 Apr 2016, at 00:15, hiren panchasara <[e-mail]> wrote:
> > 
> > On 04/12/16 at 05:14P, Jana Iyengar wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >> 
> >> The minutes of the ICCRG meeting at IETF95 are now posted
> >> <https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/95/minutes/minutes-95-iccrg>. Please send
> >> corrections to the list or to the chairs.
> >> 
> >> Thanks much, Gorry, for taking these down!
> > 
> > Thanks for the notes. 
> > 
> > It'd be awesome if I can get a clarification in following though:
> > 
> > From - Michael Welzl: TCP in UDP (draft-welzl-irtf-iccrg-tcp-in-udp-00)
> > Michael Tuexen: How do you ensure the right sequence of UDP packets and
> > TCP-in-UDP packets on the server side, when using multicore systems?
> > Michael: In our cases this worked.
> > 
> > Was there more discussed and is missed in the notes? Can Michael Welzl or
> > someone else elaborate?
> My point was that some NICs distribute incoming packets to multiple
> threads and that the TCP/IP and TCP/UDP/IP might end up in different
> threads. So it is hard to ensure sequence preservation in that case.
> If you only use a single thread, there might be no issue.
> 
> I think a couple of other agreed that this is an issue and we stopped
> discussing it.

I do understand the problem. I was wondering if there was any discussion
towards possible solutions specific to this draft/work.

Thanks for clarifying.

Cheers,
Hiren