Re: [iccrg] Background on my talk in iccrg

Bob Briscoe <ietf@bobbriscoe.net> Thu, 28 March 2019 16:03 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@bobbriscoe.net>
X-Original-To: iccrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iccrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9804E12008A for <iccrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 09:03:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bobbriscoe.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7phNroXFlVnh for <iccrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 09:03:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from server.dnsblock1.com (server.dnsblock1.com [85.13.236.178]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3218C120096 for <iccrg@irtf.org>; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 09:03:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bobbriscoe.net; s=default; h=Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=vnZuEwvEJ/pImmSuYWm9V/bSWrsimkWPfSj9Un3W0fE=; b=ExWykSPVVkdSrCDnw2SeMfmae cQmdk1RKmG9MarLVa696JDBJtGZI76Xe4tylfICBbUYK36oQj7wPpqyQ4yq1tATUmxtojtpuiJwVb 0don0L8ymilf9Zr1+Fn1lmr+l7WgCbsNPUkhc5REISnoe5txerWsgKuQWdVktDAELtxe+kEq/pMvo DbvSexK6Jkzq8n18yeMW6HGjv+S1xv5CSdWW9XGz4M8xU3v3cWMpzC4Swyv+MVvk3LniL2qD9F8tz Aisrd59RAhX4ycR+GIdZClt4z0ZFP3ApLxMoGq+wD7+qjql534gwtpqKn8FTaTIxy24m3gvLH5rI/ xxVN7Y/Sg==;
Received: from dhcp-819f.meeting.ietf.org ([31.133.129.159]:59540) by server.dnsblock1.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from <ietf@bobbriscoe.net>) id 1h9XUr-0002Ad-1q; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 16:03:17 +0000
To: Peyman Teymoori <peymant@ifi.uio.no>, "iccrg@irtf.org" <iccrg@irtf.org>
References: <9D7CBDDC-EEDC-4510-96D6-EA893826F190@ifi.uio.no>
From: Bob Briscoe <ietf@bobbriscoe.net>
Message-ID: <d05eb4b8-53ae-82be-5442-711c3316940b@bobbriscoe.net>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 17:03:16 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <9D7CBDDC-EEDC-4510-96D6-EA893826F190@ifi.uio.no>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------D1E489B51D623C9ACE6CB538"
Content-Language: en-GB
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server.dnsblock1.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - irtf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - bobbriscoe.net
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server.dnsblock1.com: authenticated_id: in@bobbriscoe.net
X-Authenticated-Sender: server.dnsblock1.com: in@bobbriscoe.net
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iccrg/hzCikxVItogdNjJNLSIHa9C0Jio>
Subject: Re: [iccrg] Background on my talk in iccrg
X-BeenThere: iccrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussions of Internet Congestion Control Research Group \(ICCRG\)" <iccrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/iccrg>, <mailto:iccrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/iccrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:iccrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iccrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/iccrg>, <mailto:iccrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 16:03:24 -0000

Peyman,

The approx additive property of combinatorial probability at low marking 
probability is only one way to get the additive network utility 
maximization property of the network.

Alternatively, you can transform the signal into the number space 
between [0,1] by using p/(1-p) which you can do in the end-system by 
measuring your congestion level as the distance between ECN marks, 
rather than the the probability of marking.

This is explained in the Unsaturated Marking section of this tech report:
http://bobbriscoe.net/projects/latency/ccdi_tr.pdf#subsection.3.1

We presented some of the highlights of this paper in ICCRG in the past, 
but I think we had to skip this section, due to lack of time (at least I 
cannot find the slides we originally prepared in the copy in the IETF 
proceedings, but I thought we had presented it at some time).


Bob

On 21/03/2019 13:18, Peyman Teymoori wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I would like to share the report (preprint) we have been working on with you before the meeting in Prague since my presentation will be about it. This is actually a research work, and we will consider deployment challenges more thoroughly in our future work.
>
> Kind regards,
> Peyman
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> iccrg mailing list
> iccrg@irtf.org
> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/iccrg

-- 
________________________________________________________________
Bob Briscoe                               http://bobbriscoe.net/